2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Validity of Brief Cognitive Screenings for Early Dementia Detection in Spanish-Speaking Adults in Latin America

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of brief cognitive screening (BCS) tools designed to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in Spanish-speaking individuals over the age of 50 years from Latin America (LA). Methods: A systematic search of titles and abstracts in Medline, Biomed Central, Embase, Scopus, Scirus, PsycINFO, LILACS, and SciELO was conducted. Inclusion criteria were papers written in English or Spanish involving samples from Spanish-speaking Latin American individuals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(192 reference statements)
2
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For the cognitive assessment, we elected the T-MoCa, which has shown important indicators of sensitivity and specificity for cognitive alterations [18] and an important concurrent validity with the full version [22]. In Latin America, the MoCa test is the more frequently brief cognitive test used in clinical settings [23]. It contains 5 items that assess memory, fluency, and orientation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cognitive assessment, we elected the T-MoCa, which has shown important indicators of sensitivity and specificity for cognitive alterations [18] and an important concurrent validity with the full version [22]. In Latin America, the MoCa test is the more frequently brief cognitive test used in clinical settings [23]. It contains 5 items that assess memory, fluency, and orientation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMSE and IFS were selected given their utility among persons with educational levels of at least primary school and have been used widely among Spanish-speaking older adults ( 45 ). Moreover, the Peruvian Spanish version of the MMSE has been found to be highly sensitive and specific when comparing dementia vs. SCD (sensitivity 91%, specificity 75%) and dementia vs. MCI (sensitivity 87%, specificity 75%) among Peruvians living in Lima, Peru ( 46 , 47 ). The MMSE is a brief cognitive screening tool that evaluates orientation (in time and space), immediate recall (or 3-word recall), attention and calculation, delayed recall, language (naming, repetition, reading, writing, performing verbal commands) and constructive praxis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unmeasured epidemiological variables that contribute to heterogeneity may also exist. Likewise, diagnostic tests reflect knowledge of the historical and cultural context [43]; therefore, it would be significant to have cultural adaptations of each instrument to obtain a more accurate prevalence of cognitive impairment [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%