2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of Tumor Segmentation Strategies for Bone Metastases

Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the segmentation approaches for bone metastases in differentiating benign from malignant bone lesions and characterizing malignant bone lesions. Method: The literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, IEEE and MedLine, and Web of Science electronic databases following the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 77 original articles, 24 review articles, and 1 comparison paper published between January 2010 and March 202… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 124 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical significance in DSC improvement for papers which excluded cross validation compared to those which included it indicates the potential of an overfitting problem in these cases, highlighting the importance of test sets and external validation for generalizability. While other reviews have investigated similar segmentation performance tasks applied to various lesions or whole organs, to the best of our knowledge, ours is the first to focus on deep learning techniques applied specifically to lesions of the bone ( 70 77 ). Additionally, ours is the first which specifically evaluates differences in segmentation performance specifically as they relate to imaging modality, imaging dimensionality, and predominant lesion characteristic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical significance in DSC improvement for papers which excluded cross validation compared to those which included it indicates the potential of an overfitting problem in these cases, highlighting the importance of test sets and external validation for generalizability. While other reviews have investigated similar segmentation performance tasks applied to various lesions or whole organs, to the best of our knowledge, ours is the first to focus on deep learning techniques applied specifically to lesions of the bone ( 70 77 ). Additionally, ours is the first which specifically evaluates differences in segmentation performance specifically as they relate to imaging modality, imaging dimensionality, and predominant lesion characteristic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%