2012
DOI: 10.1108/10610421211264892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review on B2B branding: research issues and avenues for future research

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to review the current body of the B2B branding literature, and identify research issues that hamper current B2B branding research.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a systematic review, and identifies 73 relevant journal publications from the years 1973‐2010 that were subsequently evaluated for further analysis.FindingsThis study identifies five possible issues hampering current B2B branding research: the lack of systematic theory development, the transference of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
102
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(142 reference statements)
3
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous order-winning criteria such as reliability and quality are now assumed as minimum requirements, and the increased use of outsourcing and partnerships has increased the pressure on firms to build trust through strong brands (Lynch and de Chernatony, 2007). As a response to increasing industry attention, particularly since 2000, recent years have seen the publication of a vast number of B2B branding articles and special issues of journals (Keränen et al, 2012), with a substantial research stream appearing only very recently in the literature (Roberts and Merrilees, 2007;Leek and Christodoulides, 2011). However, the extant literature remains embryonic, fragmented, contradictory, largely subjective in nature, limited in its scope and essentially based on narrative literature reviews (Glynn et al, 2007;Roberts and Merrilees, 2007;Keränen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous order-winning criteria such as reliability and quality are now assumed as minimum requirements, and the increased use of outsourcing and partnerships has increased the pressure on firms to build trust through strong brands (Lynch and de Chernatony, 2007). As a response to increasing industry attention, particularly since 2000, recent years have seen the publication of a vast number of B2B branding articles and special issues of journals (Keränen et al, 2012), with a substantial research stream appearing only very recently in the literature (Roberts and Merrilees, 2007;Leek and Christodoulides, 2011). However, the extant literature remains embryonic, fragmented, contradictory, largely subjective in nature, limited in its scope and essentially based on narrative literature reviews (Glynn et al, 2007;Roberts and Merrilees, 2007;Keränen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1990s, there were only a few articles on business-to-business (B2B) branding (Roberts and Merrilees, 2007) and research was neglected (Keränen et al, 2012). Much of the early B2B branding research emphasized the role of brands as a product differentiator, considering whether a brand name conferred any competitive advantage to the selling organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Majority of literature seeking application of brand in B2B context is not more than a decade old (Leek and Christodoulides, 2011;Glynn, 2012;Keränen et al, 2012). By and large these articles have evaluated the effect of brand on customer's buying process (Baumgarth, 2010).…”
Section: Brand Orientation In B2b Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branding strategies in B2B sector was quite unpopular subject for scholars before 2007 (Keränen et al, 2012). Only in recent years, practitioners and academics realized the need to advance the understanding of brand's role in inter-organizational transactions because a strong brand is often associated with several strategic benefits (Leek & Christodoulides, 2011;Glynn, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%