2018
DOI: 10.1002/hed.25458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review on location and timing of distant progression in human papillomavirus‐positive and human papillomavirus‐negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas

Abstract: Distant progression (DP) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has significant impact on morbidity and mortality. This study systematically reviewed the literature on studies reporting location and timing of DP after human papillomavirus (HPV)+ or HPV− OPSCCs. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies reporting DP in patients treated with curative intend for an OPSCC. Outcome was site of and time to DP stratified on HPV‐status. Seven studies (n = 1564; 77% HPV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, patients who are positive for both HPV-DNA and p16 (HPV-DNAþ/p16þ) have shown a significantly better overall survival rate compared to HPV-DNA-/p16þ, or HPV-DNAþ/p16-patients, who may be considered HPV-positive in studies using either HPV-DNA or p16 status solely when defining HPV-status [12]. Referring to a recent systematic review, the risk of distant progression was lower in HPV-positive patients compared to HPV-negative patients [13]. The rate of locoregional recurrences in the two groups has not yet been fully explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, patients who are positive for both HPV-DNA and p16 (HPV-DNAþ/p16þ) have shown a significantly better overall survival rate compared to HPV-DNA-/p16þ, or HPV-DNAþ/p16-patients, who may be considered HPV-positive in studies using either HPV-DNA or p16 status solely when defining HPV-status [12]. Referring to a recent systematic review, the risk of distant progression was lower in HPV-positive patients compared to HPV-negative patients [13]. The rate of locoregional recurrences in the two groups has not yet been fully explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies from this group have attempted to assess the prevalence of HPV infection among the adult and pediatric clinic populations [15][16][17]. These studies appeared to support evidence that has suggested the incidence of oral HPV infection in the United States may, in fact, be increasing [8,9,11]. However, other recent studies of microbial prevalence have recently increased the potential pool of oral samples available for further HPV screening and analysis [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, HPV infection has been identified as a clinically significant biomarker and prognostic indicator for oral squamous cell carcinomas [9][10][11]. These studies suggest that oral infection with high-risk HPV may significantly increase the risk of developing oral cancers, as well as limiting the long-term prognosis for these patients [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only is overall survival after distant failure longer in these patients, but about one third of oligometastatic cases in the lungs can be cured with either surgery or radiotherapy (7,30). Noteworthy, compared with their HPV-negative; counterparts, patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer present more often with dissemination to more than two organs (about one third of cases) that can also involve unusual localizations such as the skeletal muscles, pericardial lymph nodes, kidney, or pancreatic tail (6)(7)(8). Therefore, careful evaluation and sometimes even multiple biopsies are warranted in these cases.…”
Section: Clinical Pre-treatment Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They usually occur within 2–3 years of diagnosis with the notable exception of a small proportion (probably more than 10%) of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer cases, which continue to metastasize for a longer period of time, even beyond 6 years ( 6 , 7 ). Interestingly, in a recent meta-analysis of seven studies, time to distant progression was 0.2–106 months and 0.2–33 months in HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer patients, respectively ( 8 ).…”
Section: Distant Metastases: Who How and Whatmentioning
confidence: 99%