Systematic Review Shows Only Few Reliable Studies of Physical Activity Intervention in Adolescents

Abstract

Introduction. Several studies have pointed to the high prevalence of low levels of physical activity in adolescents, suggesting the need for more effective interventions for this group. The aim of this study was to present evidence of intervention programs for efficacy of physical activity for adolescents. Methods. Surveys in PubMed, SportDiscus, LiLacs, and SciELO databases were conducted using keywords to identify population, intervention, and outcome, as well as DeCS and MeSH terms in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, whenever appropriate. The review included observational studies with minimal intervention of six months, minimum sample size of 100 adolescents, written in any language, and those who have reached STROBE score greater than 70%. Results. Only seven studies met all inclusion criteria. Of these, five were pre- and postintervention and two had n > 2000 participants. Interventions were of several types, durations, and strategies for physical activity implementation. Behavior change was assessed in 43% of studies and three reported success in some way. Conclusion. Due to heterogeneity in their contents and methodologies, as well as the lack of jobs that accompany adolescents after the intervention period, one cannot draw conclusions about the actual effects of the intervention programs of physical activity on the behavior of young people.

Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review

“…Thus, in the current review, all 22 items of the STROBE were assessed, and sufficient reporting quality was assigned to studies which met the following standards: a clear statement of objective(s) (item 3), described eligibility (inclusion and exclusion) criteria (item 6), defined outcome variables (items 7 and 11), described statistical methods used (item 12), description of number and characteristics of participants provided (items 13 and 14), outcomes measures and main results (items 15 and 16) and provided summary and interpretation of key results in concurrence with the study aims provided (items 18, 20, and 21). Fulfilment of these 12 STROBE items corresponds to more than 50% of all 22 STROBE items, a cutoff which has been used in several previous studies [ 9 – 11 ]. All 22 items of the STROBE statement were discussed between two reviewers before quality assessment (DJ, MAM) to reach a consensus of understanding on each item of the checklist.…”

Efficacy of gamification-based smartphone application for weight loss in overweight and obese adolescents: study protocol for a phase II randomized controlled trial

“…The efficacy of innovative treatment strategies, like gamification, will be analyzed due to their current heterogeneity in terms of contents and methodologies of interventions and studies. 41 Due to their potential to improve the reach and access to target populations, the trial uses a smartphone application. 42 However, to this day there is no clear understanding of the processes through which such applications work.…”