Pharmacy Practice Research Methods 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2993-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Pharmacy Practice

Abstract: the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth to note that the small data set conforming to the eligibility criteria is one of the limitations of this study. Despite the pooling and normalization effects of the meta-analysis study conduction, increasing the number of the analyzed studies would decrease the heterogeneity and publication bias [ 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to note that the small data set conforming to the eligibility criteria is one of the limitations of this study. Despite the pooling and normalization effects of the meta-analysis study conduction, increasing the number of the analyzed studies would decrease the heterogeneity and publication bias [ 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%