1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic reviews in nursing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This literature review is an essential step in the identification of evidence‐based perioperative nursing (8). Literature reviews reduce research to key findings in a reliable way and offer a means of enabling perioperative care professionals to keep abreast of research (9). Sampling of the study started with searching in the Cinahl database using the word ‘perioperative’ associated with ‘dialogues’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature review is an essential step in the identification of evidence‐based perioperative nursing (8). Literature reviews reduce research to key findings in a reliable way and offer a means of enabling perioperative care professionals to keep abreast of research (9). Sampling of the study started with searching in the Cinahl database using the word ‘perioperative’ associated with ‘dialogues’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature search that was inspired by Droogan and Cullum (1998), was carried out in the following databases: Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and MedLine/PubMed (Table 1). Searches were made by combining indexed terms from the thesauruses of these databases and free text using the Boolean operators “OR” and “AND.” Initially, a large number of search words were chosen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method followed the guidelines for systematic reviews by Droogan and Cullum (), adjusted to the purpose and scope of the present review paper. We have successfully followed these guidelines in previous reviews of the evidence in a number of areas, including cancer (Chouliara et al, ) and psychological trauma (Karatzias et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%