2018
DOI: 10.1111/trf.14952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic reviews of guidelines and studies for single versus multiple unit transfusion strategies

Abstract: BACKGROUND Recent recommendations indicate that one red blood cell (RBC) unit should be transfused at a time, with reassessment after each transfusion, which may be extrapolated from literature supporting restrictive transfusion triggers rather than specific evidence. Therefore, two systematic reviews were performed to identify the following: 1) RBC transfusion guidelines and review articles to determine if single‐ or multiple‐unit transfusion strategies are recommended and 2) studies comparing strategies for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-unit transfusion constitutes part of restrictive transfusion strategies and is a cornerstone of patient blood management (PBM). Despite the absence of a high level of evidence, single-unit transfusion is included in the majority of guidelines [52]. The benefit of this type of transfusion practice is supported by a number of factors.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-unit transfusion constitutes part of restrictive transfusion strategies and is a cornerstone of patient blood management (PBM). Despite the absence of a high level of evidence, single-unit transfusion is included in the majority of guidelines [52]. The benefit of this type of transfusion practice is supported by a number of factors.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, this does not imply a general inefficacy of single-unit transfusion episodes, as an abundant number of studies performed in varying patient cohorts consistently demonstrated a strong reduction of up to 40% in RBC use after changing to single-unit transfusion practices. 6,8,10,11 Analysis of predefined safety parameters did not demonstrate any change in duration of admission, duration of neutropenia, 30-day mortality, number of platelet transfusions per admission, and de novo cardiac arrhythmic events (Table SVI). Although the number of intensive-care unit (ICU) admissions increased (2Á6% during the liberal and 6Á7% during the restrictive transfusion period, P = 0Á05), this was ascribed to a change in practice aiming at ICU transfers at an earlier stage of clinical deterioration.…”
Section: Table Siii] Approximating An Estimated Cost Saving Of ˜€25á0...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consequently but specifically and solely applying to treatments inducing a limited duration of aplasia, a stricter Hb threshold rather than the switch to single‐unit transfusion episodes seems the main contributor to blood product savings. Notwithstanding, this does not imply a general inefficacy of single‐unit transfusion episodes, as an abundant number of studies performed in varying patient cohorts consistently demonstrated a strong reduction of up to 40% in RBC use after changing to single‐unit transfusion practices 6,8,10,11 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In einer aktuellen Übersichtsarbeit zeigte sich nach Implementierung einer Single Unit Policy in gemischten Patientenkollektiven eine Reduktion des EK-Verbrauchs um bis zu 40% – wobei keine erhöhte Inzidenz kardiovaskulärer Ereignisse beobachtet wurde. Dieselbe Arbeit kam zu dem Ergebnis, dass nur wenige internationale Transfusionsleitlinien diese Maßnahme bisher in ihre Empfehlungen explizit aufgenommen haben 36 . In Ländern wie z.…”
Section: Therapieoptionenunclassified