2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science

Abstract: Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic reviews are clinically useful and sometimes another type of review (scoping, topical, or critical) would be of greater value to the clinical and scientific community. The different types of review and their use are described, illustrated by examples relevant to vascular surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we tended to exclude articles which focused on sector or discipline-specific areas of knowledge (e.g. health, engineering, computer science) as these generally focus on the application of frequently discussed concepts in a given context, and also, literature reviews that did not reveal new significant findings in the field (Hammersley, 2020 ; Powell et al, 2022 ). When assessing quality of the sources, we kept in mind that grey literature (such as reports by international and independent organisations) may not strictly meet the highest standards of academic rigour (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we tended to exclude articles which focused on sector or discipline-specific areas of knowledge (e.g. health, engineering, computer science) as these generally focus on the application of frequently discussed concepts in a given context, and also, literature reviews that did not reveal new significant findings in the field (Hammersley, 2020 ; Powell et al, 2022 ). When assessing quality of the sources, we kept in mind that grey literature (such as reports by international and independent organisations) may not strictly meet the highest standards of academic rigour (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our decision to opt for a non-systematic review and carry out a thematic analysis inductively comes at the cost of a certain bias towards our own professional interests and disciplinary perspectives. We nonetheless defend our approach as it facilitates the inclusion of voices which are often marginalised in the academic discussion or overshadowed by reports of financially strong institutions (Powell & Koelemay, 2022 ). Furthermore, databases that are reputable in academic venues are often dominated by for-profit publishing houses and also not free from algorithmic biases.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge this paper is the first systematic literature search on the topic of legal issues surrounding or arising from medical 3DP. Systematic search methodologies (including systematic reviews, scoping reviews, topical reviews and critical reviews) (Powell and Koelemay, 2022), while the mainstay of medical research, are not common in the legal field. This became evident while extending our search into legal databases.…”
Section: Methodological Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para ello se realizó una primera aproximación mediante palabras clave, la valoración de la relación pregunta de investigación-metodología, scoping review y la discusión de los autores sobre la correcta adaptación de los componentes (estrategia de búsqueda, criterios y extracción de datos) (Khalil y Tricco, 2022). El resultado de esta fase inicial fue la determinación de que esta sería la mejor metodología debido a su carácter exploratorio, su alcance amplio, pero profundo, y la mejor aportación a las bases de futuros estudios (Powell y Koelemay, 2022).…”
Section: Metodología Enfoque Epistemológico Y Metodológicounclassified