Systematic scoping review on moral distress among physicians

Abstract

BackgroundConcepts of moral distress (MD) among physicians have evolved and extend beyond the notion of psychological distress caused by being in a situation in which one is constrained from acting on what one knows to be right. With many accounts involving complex personal, professional, legal, ethical and moral issues, we propose a review of current understanding of MD among physicians.MethodsA systematic evidence-based approach guided systematic scoping review is proposed to map the current concepts of MD among physicians published in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ERIC and Google Scholar databases. Concurrent and independent thematic and direct content analysis (split approach) was conducted on included articles to enhance the reliability and transparency of the process. The themes and categories identified were combined using the jigsaw perspective to create domains that form the framework of the discussion that follows.ResultsA total of 30 156 abstracts were identified, 2473 full-text articles were reviewed and 128 articles were included. The five domains identified were as follows: (1) current concepts, (2) risk factors, (3) impact, (4) tools and (5) interventions.ConclusionsInitial reviews suggest that MD involves conflicts within a physician’s personal beliefs, values and principles (personal constructs) caused by personal, ethical, moral, contextual, professional and sociocultural factors. How these experiences are processed and reflected on and then integrated into the physician’s personal constructs impacts their self-concepts of personhood and identity and can result in MD. The ring theory of personhood facilitates an appreciation of how new experiences create dissonance and resonance within personal constructs. These insights allow the forwarding of a new broader concept of MD and a personalised approach to assessing and treating MD. While further studies are required to test these findings, they offer a personalised means of supporting a physician’s MD and preventing burn-out.

A systematic scoping review of reflective writing in medical education

“…To synthesise a coherent narrative from the multiple accounts of reflective writing, we adopt Krishna’s Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) [ 10 , 15 , 21 , 46 – 53 ]. A SEBA-guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) [ 13 – 24 , 50 , 53 – 55 ] facilitates reproducible, accountable and transparent analysis of patterns, relationships and disagreements from multiple angles [ 56 ].…”

Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review

“…A Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR) (henceforth SSR in SEBA) is proposed to map CEP portfolio use in medicine to guide the design, structuring and support of a proposed programme 13–17 20–22 24 25 27–50. Given space constraints, we briefly describe the six stages in the construction of SSRs in SEBA in figure 1 and more advanced details of the systematic approach, split approach, jigsaw perspective, funnelling process, reiterative process and synthesis of SSR in online supplemental appendix A 16 27 28 35 41 48 51–56…”

Moral caring competency and moral distress among Ghanaian nurses in adult care settings: A descriptive-correlational study

“…However, in their daily efforts to offer quality care, nurses encounter moral conflicts as frontline caregivers at the bedside (Hoskins et al, 2018 ). Compared to other healthcare workers, according to Giannetta et al ( 2021 ), 42% of nurses internationally confront a greater number of moral dilemmas in the clinical context (Prompahakul et al, 2021 ; Quek et al, 2022 ). In an attempt to mitigate this phenomenon, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code for Ethics and the American Nurses Association (ANA) developed a model for a professional code of ethics for nurses (Ramathuba & Ndou, 2020 ).…”