2015
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic screening for drug-resistant tuberculosis with Xpert<SUP>®</SUP> MTB/RIF in a referral hospital in Cambodia

Abstract: Screening presumptive MDR-TB patients with Xpert enabled rapid diagnosis and treatment of MDR-TB. Xpert performed well, provided appropriate risk assessment was done. Rapid confirmatory testing added little to clinical decision making. Our findings support the latest World Health Organization guidelines to abandon confirmatory LPA in favour of repeat Xpert when in clinical doubt, pending phenotypic DST.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered 11 studies (19%) to have unclear risk of bias because the manner of participant selection was not reported ( Barmankulova 2015 ; Barnard 2015 ; Bates 2013a ; Huang 2015 ; Kim CH 2015 ; Luetkemeyer 2016 ; Meawed 2016 ; Moussa 2016 ; Nosova 2013a ; Pimkina 2015 ; Singh 2016 ). With respect to applicability, we considered 26 studies (46%) to have low concern because participants in these studies were evaluated in primary care facilities, local hospitals, or both settings ( Al‐Darraji 2013 ; Balcells 2012 ; Barmankulova 2015 ; Boehme 2010 ; Boehme 2011 ; Carriquiry 2012 ; Chikaonda 2017 ; Dorman 2018 ; Friedrich 2011 ; Huang 2015 ; Kurbaniyazova 2017 ; Kurbatova 2013 ; Kwak 2013 ; Lawn 2011 ; Lorent 2015 ; Luetkemeyer 2016 ; Meawed 2016 ; Metcalfe 2016 ; O'Donnell 2015 ; Pimkina 2015 ; Rice 2017 ; Scott 2011 ; Sohn 2014 ; Ssengooba 2014 ; Theron 2011 ; Van Rie 2013 ). We considered four studies to have high concern (7%) because participants were evaluated exclusively as inpatients in tertiary care centres ( Bates 2013a ; Calligaro 2015 ; Kim CH 2015 ; Lippincott 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We considered 11 studies (19%) to have unclear risk of bias because the manner of participant selection was not reported ( Barmankulova 2015 ; Barnard 2015 ; Bates 2013a ; Huang 2015 ; Kim CH 2015 ; Luetkemeyer 2016 ; Meawed 2016 ; Moussa 2016 ; Nosova 2013a ; Pimkina 2015 ; Singh 2016 ). With respect to applicability, we considered 26 studies (46%) to have low concern because participants in these studies were evaluated in primary care facilities, local hospitals, or both settings ( Al‐Darraji 2013 ; Balcells 2012 ; Barmankulova 2015 ; Boehme 2010 ; Boehme 2011 ; Carriquiry 2012 ; Chikaonda 2017 ; Dorman 2018 ; Friedrich 2011 ; Huang 2015 ; Kurbaniyazova 2017 ; Kurbatova 2013 ; Kwak 2013 ; Lawn 2011 ; Lorent 2015 ; Luetkemeyer 2016 ; Meawed 2016 ; Metcalfe 2016 ; O'Donnell 2015 ; Pimkina 2015 ; Rice 2017 ; Scott 2011 ; Sohn 2014 ; Ssengooba 2014 ; Theron 2011 ; Van Rie 2013 ). We considered four studies to have high concern (7%) because participants were evaluated exclusively as inpatients in tertiary care centres ( Bates 2013a ; Calligaro 2015 ; Kim CH 2015 ; Lippincott 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Reference Standard domain, we considered 47 studies (82%) to have low risk of bias because the results of the reference standard were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test. We considered four studies (7%) to have high risk of bias because the result of the reference standard was not blinded ( Lorent 2015 ; Safianowska 2012 ; Zeka 2011 ; Zmak 2013 ) and the remaining six studies (11%) to have unclear risk of bias because information was not reported. With respect to applicability in the Reference Standard domain, we considered all studies to have low concern because in these studies all specimens had already been speciated and identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Active case finding techniques for both HIV and TB within communities thought to be at high risk have been supported, similar to the index case methods used by Infomóvel [ 35 ]. In Cambodia, CHWs conducted active door-to-door screening and sputum sample collection for TB, sending test results and referrals via SMS to the health facility [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%