2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
379
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 479 publications
(427 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
29
379
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This constitutes an interesting result given the high sensitivity of osteoblasts to roughness at different scales [7,9,[38][39][40][41] and the strong influence of fractal dimension on osteoblastic adhesion and differentiation [10]. Regarding the roughness parameters, although the lack of standardization in the measurements makes comparison difficult with other studies, the values of S a , S dr , S ds and S ci which were obtained here fall within the range of the reported values for commercial dental implants with proved high success rate [8,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Surface Topography Over Etching Timementioning
confidence: 72%
“…This constitutes an interesting result given the high sensitivity of osteoblasts to roughness at different scales [7,9,[38][39][40][41] and the strong influence of fractal dimension on osteoblastic adhesion and differentiation [10]. Regarding the roughness parameters, although the lack of standardization in the measurements makes comparison difficult with other studies, the values of S a , S dr , S ds and S ci which were obtained here fall within the range of the reported values for commercial dental implants with proved high success rate [8,[42][43][44].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Surface Topography Over Etching Timementioning
confidence: 72%
“…Not only the chemistry but also the topography of the surface of a biomaterial has a major influence on the interaction of biomaterials with cells starting initially with cell attachment which determines the subsequent processes like cell adhesion, spreading, morphology, migration, proliferation and differentiation [39]. Generally, the response of cells to surface topography differs according to cell type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…roughness) on material surfaces are also crucial in cell and tissue responses to biomaterials. Indeed, surface roughness has shown to alter fibroblast proliferation on aluminiun, titanium and titanium alloys substrates [60][61][62] , and strongly influence bacterial attachment to nitinol, titanium and glass surfaces [63][64][65][66] . Overall, the three functionalization strategies displayed the same value of R a (~ 30 nm; Table 2), slightly increasing the original R a of control samples (~ 25 nm; Table 2).…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterization Of the Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%