2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6439/aa7665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic study of packaging designs on the performance of CMOS thermoresistive micro calorimetric flow sensors

Abstract: We systematically study the effect of two packaging configurations for the CMOS thermoresistive micro calorimetric flow (TMCF) sensors: S-type with the sensor chip protrusion-mounted on the flow channel wall and E-type with the sensor chip flush-mounted on the flow channel wall. Although the experimental results indicated that the sensitivity of the S-type was increased by more than 30%; the corresponding flow range as compared to the E-type was dramatically reduced by 60% from 0-11 m s −1 to 0-4.5 m s −1. Com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensor size herein was 300 µm × 250 µm in Figure 7a,b, which is smaller than many prior arts'. Within the flow speed range of 0-15 m/s in a wind tunnel, a normalized sensitivity of this small CMOS MEMS sensor was obtained as 138 µV/V/(m/s)/mW, which is with the same order of magnitude to the best value of 160 µV/V/(m/s)/mW of the prior arts [59,60,62,76,93,94,97,185].…”
Section: Smaller Device Sizementioning
confidence: 69%
“…The sensor size herein was 300 µm × 250 µm in Figure 7a,b, which is smaller than many prior arts'. Within the flow speed range of 0-15 m/s in a wind tunnel, a normalized sensitivity of this small CMOS MEMS sensor was obtained as 138 µV/V/(m/s)/mW, which is with the same order of magnitude to the best value of 160 µV/V/(m/s)/mW of the prior arts [59,60,62,76,93,94,97,185].…”
Section: Smaller Device Sizementioning
confidence: 69%
“…The middle part of the computational domain formed by the small MEMS cavity and the large CMOS cavity divides the flow into two regions, the upper part of which is smaller in volume and slower in flow rate. Additionally, there is a significant flow separation phenomenon caused by an adverse pressure gradient [27], which will result in two consequences: on the one hand, the heat in the upstream detector region at high flow rates cannot be carried to the downstream in time, and on the other hand, viscous friction will be generated between the return flow fluid and the upstream detector. These two factors will contribute to the temperature difference between upstream and downstream decreasing gradually with the increase in flow rate, and consequently, the measure range of the sensor will narrow.…”
Section: The Effect Of Heater-detector Spaces On Sensor Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…using porous silicon to replace SC silicon [38]) and choice of high Seebeckcoefficient thermocouple materials [41,43]. An alternative way to improve the detection of low flow rate is reducing the cross-sectional area of the fluid channel to increase flow velocity [93]. However, this approach is at the expense of sacrificing the measure range.…”
Section: Challenges and Perspective On Silicon-based Thermal Flow Sen...mentioning
confidence: 99%