2015
DOI: 10.1111/add.12995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Validation of Internet Gaming Disorder Criteria Needs to Start Somewhere: A Reply to Kardefelt‐Winther

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…predictive power) of the different criteria de ning IGD and GD [28]. For instance, 'withdrawal' and 'loss of control' appear to be more signi cantly related to an IGD diagnosis than "preoccupation", "escapism" and "negative consequences" [28,29,30]. At this point it is noted, that the IGD term and criteria [26] will be followed in the present study.…”
Section: Disordered Gaming Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…predictive power) of the different criteria de ning IGD and GD [28]. For instance, 'withdrawal' and 'loss of control' appear to be more signi cantly related to an IGD diagnosis than "preoccupation", "escapism" and "negative consequences" [28,29,30]. At this point it is noted, that the IGD term and criteria [26] will be followed in the present study.…”
Section: Disordered Gaming Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Brief selfreport screening instruments for Internet gaming disorder based on DSM-5 criteria are internally valid: The Video Game Dependency Scale (VGDS; Rehbein, Kliem, Baier, Mößle, & Petry, 2015), the Internet Gaming Disorder20 Test (IGD20; Pontes, Király, Demetrovics, & Griffiths, 2014), and the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (IGD; Lemmens, Valkenburg, & Gentile, 2015) all have some support for their concurrent validity. Two structured clinical interviews based on DSM-5 criteria for Internet gaming disorder, the Structured Clinical Interview for Internet Gaming Disorder (SCIIGD; Koo, Han, Park, & Kwon, 2017) and the Diagnostic Criteria of Internet Addiction for College Students (DCIAC; Ko et al, 2014), have adequate sensitivity and specificity for classification status.…”
Section: Internet Gaming Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%