2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematically understanding the immunity leading to CRPC progression

Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in American men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has become a standard treatment strategy for advanced PCa. Although a majority of patients initially respond to ADT well, most of them will eventually develop castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Previous studies suggest that ADT-induced changes in the immune microenvironment (mE) in PCa might be responsible for the failures of various therapies. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models capture system scale behavior in cancer patients and are capable of population level predictions of disease trajectories in response to intervention. On tissuecellular scale, ABMs have been employed and used for spatially explicit simulations to investigate emergent behavior arising from interactions between cancer and immune cells, such as spatial and spatio-temporal variations in tumor morphology and immuno-architecture (Kim et al, 2009;Shi et al, 2014;Wells et al, 2015;Gong et al, 2017;Norton et al, 2017Norton et al, , 2019Pourhasanzade et al, 2017;Hoehme et al, 2018;Ji et al, 2019). When combining QSP models with ABM, cancer models can be further enhanced by taking advantage of both model types: while the QSP module captures whole-body temporal dynamics including lymph nodes, blood, peripheral compartment, and tumor, ABM simulation accounts for crucial aspects of highgranularity features such as cancer cell clonal evolution and TME heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models capture system scale behavior in cancer patients and are capable of population level predictions of disease trajectories in response to intervention. On tissuecellular scale, ABMs have been employed and used for spatially explicit simulations to investigate emergent behavior arising from interactions between cancer and immune cells, such as spatial and spatio-temporal variations in tumor morphology and immuno-architecture (Kim et al, 2009;Shi et al, 2014;Wells et al, 2015;Gong et al, 2017;Norton et al, 2017Norton et al, , 2019Pourhasanzade et al, 2017;Hoehme et al, 2018;Ji et al, 2019). When combining QSP models with ABM, cancer models can be further enhanced by taking advantage of both model types: while the QSP module captures whole-body temporal dynamics including lymph nodes, blood, peripheral compartment, and tumor, ABM simulation accounts for crucial aspects of highgranularity features such as cancer cell clonal evolution and TME heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infiltration of lymphocytes is increased in late-stage and recurrent PCa, and the infiltration of B and T lymphocytes is very common in almost all human PCa samples with high Gleason scores [58][59][60][61]. A pre-clinical model demonstrates that androgen ablation elicits a tumor-associated inflammatory response.…”
Section: Inflammatory Signaling and Infiltrated Lymphocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis ( Li et al, 2013 ) was performed to explore the model output variation upon perturbation of variables ( Iman et al, 1981 ; Saltelli et al, 2000 ) such as patch size D , shape S , location L , mesh related cross section area A , wall shear stress W , blood flow rate F , and parameters ( Ji et al, 2017 ) such as 10 coefficients which represent the important features via DX score ( Ji et al, 2019 ; Hu et al, 2020 ). While a perturbation over a range of 5% was imposed on all factor values, the output variance was bounded by 5%, indicating the high stability of our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%