2008
DOI: 10.1071/9780643095601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds

Abstract: Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds presents an up-to-date classification of Australian birds. Building on the authors’ 1994 book, The Taxonomy and Species of Birds of Australia and its Territories, it incorporates the extensive volume of relevant systematic work since then. The findings of these studies are summarised and evaluated in the explanations for the taxonomic treatments adopted, and with the extensive citations, the book serves as a comprehensive introduction to the recent systematic litera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
164
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
164
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Species are presented in taxonomic order (Christidis & Boles, 2008 of stimulus presented (walker, jogger, walker with a leashed dog) varied between species but significantly influenced FID of the pied oystercatcher, Latham's snipe and masked lapwing (Fig. 3); curlew and sharp-tailed sandpipers approached significance (i.e., p < 0.10).…”
Section: Type Of Approach and Fidmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. Species are presented in taxonomic order (Christidis & Boles, 2008 of stimulus presented (walker, jogger, walker with a leashed dog) varied between species but significantly influenced FID of the pied oystercatcher, Latham's snipe and masked lapwing (Fig. 3); curlew and sharp-tailed sandpipers approached significance (i.e., p < 0.10).…”
Section: Type Of Approach and Fidmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Exposure to humans was included in nine models and was associated with a significantly greater FID Table 2 Mean, maximum and minimum (untransformed) FID by species exposed to a walking approach, with the GLM of best fit (highest adjusted R 2 ) for each species. Species are presented in taxonomic order (Christidis & Boles, 2008). Blanks indicate a variable not included in the model, and entries in the columns 7-9 indicate p values; the adjusted R 2 is provided for the model listed.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Fid In Response To Walker Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several assumptions were made about species to be excluded from analyses, and species were not included in grid cell totals and were eliminated from further analyses if any of the following exclusion criteria were met: (i) constituted fewer than five records in the total dataset; (ii) was an irregular or vagrant species to the area or feral species not yet naturalised, determined from the literature (Barrett et al, 2003); or, (iii) were seabird, waterbird, and nocturnal species, except the Tawny Frogmouth Podargus strigoides, from the orders or families: Anseriformes, Podicipediformes, Strigiformes, Eurostopodidae, Aeogothelidae, Procellariformes, Spenisciformes, Phalacrocaraciformes, Ciconiiformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes (sensu Christidis and Boles, 2008). A final list of 141 species (hereafter 'the filtered species list') was retained for further analysis.…”
Section: Data Organisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on bird size was tabulated as maximum mass (in grams) from HANZAB. Systematics and nomenclature of birds (Appendix A) follow Christidis and Boles (2008).…”
Section: Data Organisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species that were flying more than 20 m above the vegetation were excluded from analyses unless they were aerial feeders or raptors. Species nomenclature follows that of Christidis and Boles (2008). Presence/absence data were used because of difficulty determining the numbers of individuals in dense undergrowth and tall trees.…”
Section: Survey Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%