1994
DOI: 10.1006/adnd.1994.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics of Nuclear Charge Radii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
109
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at these very places, there appears another solution at a small ( 0.5 MeV) excitation with β having the same sign as and value close to that of MN. The calculated charge radii differ from their corresponding experimental values (where available) [19][20][21][22][23] only at second decimal place of a Fermi. These observations are now standard and well established (see, for example, Refs.…”
Section: Rmf Calculation: Results and Discussion Of Ground State mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, at these very places, there appears another solution at a small ( 0.5 MeV) excitation with β having the same sign as and value close to that of MN. The calculated charge radii differ from their corresponding experimental values (where available) [19][20][21][22][23] only at second decimal place of a Fermi. These observations are now standard and well established (see, for example, Refs.…”
Section: Rmf Calculation: Results and Discussion Of Ground State mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…We now present the calculated charge radii for the parent nuclei in Fig. 1 along with the experimental values [27][28][29][30][31]. The calculated r c are found to be in good agreement with the corresponding experimental values.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…10 we compare the calculated charge radii with data from Ref. [58]. The charge density is constructed by folding the calculated (point) proton density distribution with the empirical proton-charge distribution.…”
Section: Deformed Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each "empirical" quantity we include the range of values within which the quantity was allowed to vary during the fit. Table 2 Empirical properties of finite nuclei [57,58] employed in the fitting procedure: binding energies (E b ), charge radii (r ch ) and differences between r.m.s. neutron and proton radii (r n − r p ).…”
Section: The Coefficient D (π)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation