2018
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.766.24523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics of South American snail-eating snakes (Serpentes, Dipsadini), with the description of five new species from Ecuador and Peru

Abstract: A molecular phylogeny of the Neotropical snail-eating snakes (tribe Dipsadini) is presented including 43 (24 for the first time) of the 77 species, sampled for both nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Morphological and phylogenetic support was found for four new species of Dipsas and one of Sibon, which are described here based on their unique combination of molecular, meristic, and color pattern characteristics. Sibynomorphus is designated as a junior subjective synonym of Dipsas. Dipsas latifrontalis and D. pal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
49
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The record of the specimen SBH 171139 from Pasco, Peru, incorrectly listed as "SBI 171139" by Arteaga et al (2018), was excluded from the locality records of D. vermiculata (Appendix Table A1) because (1) the locality suggests an enormous distribution gap of more than 760 km in a straight line in relation to southernmost records from Ecuador and Peru; (2) the specimen appears initially referenced as D. catesbyi (Sentzen, 1796) by Heise et al (1995); (3) it was not examined and the change of its identity to D. vermiculata is only based on DNA sequence analyses; (4) this change was apparently influenced by an inadequate comparison where sequences of 12S gene are lacking for several species of Dipsas including the most closely related and/or similar ones such as D. pakaraima MacCulloch &Lathrop, 2004, D. pavonina Schlegel, 1837, andD. temporalis (Werner, 1909) (see Arteaga et al 2018: appendix 1); and (5) the 12S and 16S gene sequences (GenBank accession numbers Z46459 and Z46496, respectively) associated with specimen SBH 171139 by Arteaga et al (2018), actually belong to two different specimens (see Material and Methods in Heise et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The record of the specimen SBH 171139 from Pasco, Peru, incorrectly listed as "SBI 171139" by Arteaga et al (2018), was excluded from the locality records of D. vermiculata (Appendix Table A1) because (1) the locality suggests an enormous distribution gap of more than 760 km in a straight line in relation to southernmost records from Ecuador and Peru; (2) the specimen appears initially referenced as D. catesbyi (Sentzen, 1796) by Heise et al (1995); (3) it was not examined and the change of its identity to D. vermiculata is only based on DNA sequence analyses; (4) this change was apparently influenced by an inadequate comparison where sequences of 12S gene are lacking for several species of Dipsas including the most closely related and/or similar ones such as D. pakaraima MacCulloch &Lathrop, 2004, D. pavonina Schlegel, 1837, andD. temporalis (Werner, 1909) (see Arteaga et al 2018: appendix 1); and (5) the 12S and 16S gene sequences (GenBank accession numbers Z46459 and Z46496, respectively) associated with specimen SBH 171139 by Arteaga et al (2018), actually belong to two different specimens (see Material and Methods in Heise et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species identification is based on the original description by Peters (1960) as well as additional characteristics provided by Harvey and Embert (2008), Arteaga et al (2018), and distinguishable details of several specimens photographed in life from the Museo de Zoología of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (QCAZ), compiled by Pazmiño-Otamendi and Rodríguez-Guerra (2019). Locality records were also taken from the aforementioned sources in addition to The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF Secretariat 2019), especially from datasets provided by Harvard University and Senckenberg (Harvard University and Morris 2019; Senckenberg 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations