Systematische Innovation

Koltze, Karl; Souchkov, Valeri

doi:10.3139/9783446452572

Cited by 14 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…How does information relate to the use of tools in a systemic context such as that of TRIZ 2 , the Theory of Innovative Problem Solving Koltze and Souchkov (2018)? The minimal technical system as a basic notion in TRIZ is reduced to the relationship tool → acts on → object and concentrates on the purely functional effect of the tool to change the state of the processed object.…”

Section: Machines and Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the interplay of usefulness and purpose, of external and internal views of that part of the world we assign it an imagined main useful function as destination before we start to embark into its more detailed analysis as a system of the first kind. In TRIZ, this aspect of intentional anticipation of the required result as Ideal Final Result or Ideal Machine [Koltze and Souchkov (2018), ch 4.1] is a conceptual cornerstone.…”

Section: The Human-machine Relationshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The fact that a part of the user group still does not pay attention to this warning is connected to a second problem perception that is less technical in nature but has penetrated to the mental world of those users in a more mediated way -the question of the privacy of data. Both problem perceptions are in veritable contradiction to each other, a "physical contradiction" in TRIZ terminology [Koltze and Souchkov (2018), p. 67]: The device must record the data so that it can be repaired if necessary, and it must not record the data in order to guarantee data privacy. There is no space here to discuss in more detail the engineering potential of such a contradiction-oriented systematic innovation methodology.…”

Section: The Uninteded and Problem Solvingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Intentionality and Machines

Gräbe

Kleemann

2022

Philosophia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This text discusses aspects of Human-Machine Interaction from the perspectives of an engineer and a philosopher. Machines are viewed not so much as tools, but more as complex socio-technical systems. On this basis, the relation between production and use of such systems and its influence on the interaction between human and machine is examined. The concept of intentionality serves as a common thread, and its close connection with the concepts of usefulness, purpose, and functionality as well as the more socio-culturally shaped concept of destination is shown. We also discuss the connection of these considerations to current philosophical debates around Floridi’s “Onlife Manifesto”. The core of our argumentation is the significance of the unintended in the interplay between justified expectations, the intended, and experienced results of real-world cooperative action. We extend the meaning of this term up to the negatively intended as harmful effect in order to highlight the prominent position of problem solving in the socio-cultural development of humankind. We focus on information processes in that Human-Machine Interaction and the concept of unintended information. With the advancing digital transformation and the growing possibilities of digital monitoring, the importance of information processes as forms of description is growing, too. We show how the concept of non-intended information is linked to such concepts of control of development, in which the non-intended is marginalised and thus an essential driver of socio-cultural development is deactivated. We compare this with Floridi’s reflections on “fears and risks in a hyperconnected era”.

show abstract

Section: Machines and Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Human-machine Relationshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Uninteded and Problem Solvingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intentionality and Machines

Gräbe

Kleemann

2022

Philosophia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While this is a worthwhile goal, one cannot expect to find a comprehensive discussion of the theory in such a book. Instead, we refer to common textbooks on TRIZ at an advanced level (such as Altshuller (1999), Shpakovsky (2006), Koltze and Souchkov (2017), Lyubomirsky et al (2018)), we realize that ''trends of engineering system evolution'' (also called ''laws of development of technological systems'' or ''tendencies of technical system innovation'') is given a lot of space. The purpose of those trends is to predict possible evolution of systems, i. e., to find and exploit the opportunities that are coming along.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%