Systematischer Review von Übersichtsarbeiten zu Interventionen der Bewegungsförderung: Methodologie und erste Ergebnisse

Abu‐Omar, Karim; Rütten, Alfred; Burlacu, Ionuţ; Messing, Sven; Pfeifer, Klaus; Ungerer-Röhrich, Ulrike

doi:10.1055/s-0042-123502

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1 The methodology used for the systematic review of reviews is briefly described below. A more detailed characterisation has already been explicated [29, 30].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

German Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion in Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases

Geidl

Abu‐Omar

Weege

et al. 2019

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations for physical activity (PA) and PA promotion for German adults (18-65 years) with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Methods: The PA recommendations were developed based on existing PA recommendations and using a three-phased process. In phase 1, systematic literature searches were conducted for current PA recommendations for seven chronic conditions (osteoarthrosis of the hip and knee, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stable ischemic heart disease, stroke, clinical depression, and chronic non-specific back pain). In phase 2, the PA recommendations were evaluated on the basis of 28 quality criteria. High-quality recommendations were identified, and a content analysis was conducted on these recommendations. In phase 3, the findings of the content analysis were summarised, and PA recommendations for seven chronic conditions were deducted. The seven recommendations were then synthesised to generate generic German PA recommendations for adults with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). In relation to the recommendations for PA promotion, a systematic literature review was conducted on papers that reviewed the efficacy/effectiveness of interventions for PA promotion in adults with NCDs. Results: The German Recommendations for Physical Activity state that adults with NCDs should, over the course of a week, should do at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic PA, or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA, or a combination of both. Furthermore, muscle-strengthening activities should be performed at least twice a week. The promotion of PA among adults with NCDs should be theory-based, specifically target PA behaviour, and be tailored to the respective target group. In this context, and as an intervention method, exercise referral schemes are one of the more promising methods of promoting PA in adults with NCDs. Conclusion: The development of evidence-based recommendations for PA and PA promotion is an important step in terms of the initiation and implementation of actions for PA-related health promotion in Germany. The German Recommendations for PA and PA promotion inform adults affected by NCDs and health professionals on how much PA would be optimal for adults with NCDs. Additionally, the recommendations provide professionals entrusted in PA promotion the best strategies and interventions to raise low PA levels in adults with NCDs. The formulation of specific PA recommendations for adults with NCDs and their combination with recommendations on PA promotion is a unique characteristic of the German recommendations.

show abstract

“…1 The methodology used for the systematic review of reviews is briefly described below. A more detailed characterisation has already been explicated [29, 30].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

German Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion in Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases

Geidl

Abu‐Omar

Weege

et al. 2019

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The recommendations for PA promotion resulted from three comprehensive literature reviews on the topics of efficacy/effectiveness of PA interventions [38], cost-effectiveness of PA interventions [39, 40] and quality criteria for their implementation [41]. Early on, it was decided that the main goal was to establish a firm evidence base for PA promotion in order to ensure political impact.…”

Section: Main Textmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to answer these questions, the following reviews were conducted:Systematic review of reviews on the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions [38], which ultimately identified 213 reviews that dealt with the topic of PA promotion. Six electronic databases were searched in the process.…”

Section: Main Textmentioning

confidence: 99%

How can the impact of national recommendations for physical activity be increased? Experiences from Germany

Rütten

Abu‐Omar

Messing

et al. 2018

Health Res Policy Sys

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundClearly stated national recommendations for physical activity (PA) are available in many nations. Yet, their impact on national level policy-making might be considered modest at best. This paper analyses the approach selected to curtail this problem in Germany.Main textAcademics, government institutions and relevant stakeholders worked in collaboration to produce a series of national recommendations for PA and PA promotion published in 2016. Since their publication, these recommendations have achieved a measurable political impact through a systematic approach focused on dissemination and implementation strategies. For example, the German Conference of Health Ministers has acknowledged the national recommendations, endorsed their dissemination and proposed that they are included in measures within the Federal Prevention Act.ConclusionSince their publication, the national recommendations have yielded satisfactory political impact. The contributing aspects might partially be explained by the Multiple Streams Approach.

show abstract

“…To integrate practice-based evidence with scientific evidence, the next step included a comparison of these key components with the recent evidence from the literature regarding the effectiveness of community-based PA-promotion focusing on populations with social disadvantages ( Ball et al , 2015 ; Conn and Coon Sells, 2016 ; Mendoza-Vasconez et al , 2016 ; Rütten and Pfeifer, 2016 ; Abu-Omar et al. , 2017 ; Craike et al , 2018 ; Griffith et al , 2018 ; Hu et al , 2019 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-producing an action-oriented framework for community-based Physical Activity Promotion in Germany

Kohler

Helsper

Dippon

et al. 2021

Health Promotion International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary German National Recommendations for Physical Activity (PA) and PA Promotion recommend community-based approaches to promote PA at the local level with a focus on health equity. In addition, the German Federal Prevention Act addresses health equity and strengthens setting-based health promotion in communities. However, the implementation of both in the local context remains a challenge. This article describes Phase 1 of the KOMBINE project that aims to co-produce an action-oriented framework for community-based PA promotion focusing on structural change and health equity. (i) In a series of workshops, key stakeholders and researchers discussed facilitators, barriers and needs of community-based PA promotion focusing on health equity. (ii) The research team used an inductive approach to cluster all findings and to identify key components and then (iii) compared the key components with updated literature. (iv) Key components were discussed and incorporated into a gradually co-produced framework by the participants. The first result of the co-production process was a catalog of nine key components regarding PA-related health promotion in German communities. The comparison of key components with scientific evidence showed a high overlap. Finally, a six-phase action-oriented framework including key components for community-based PA promotion was co-produced. The six-phase action-oriented framework integrates practice-based and scientific evidence on PA-related health promotion and health equity. It represents a shared vision for the implementation of National Recommendations for PA and PA Promotion in Germany. The extent to which structural changes and health equity can be achieved is currently being investigated in pilot-studies.

show abstract

Systematischer Review von Übersichtsarbeiten zu Interventionen der Bewegungsförderung: Methodologie und erste Ergebnisse

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

German Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion in Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases

German Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion in Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases

How can the impact of national recommendations for physical activity be increased? Experiences from Germany

Co-producing an action-oriented framework for community-based Physical Activity Promotion in Germany

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About