Systematization of IPS2 Diversification Potentials Using Product Lifecycle Data

Abramovici, Michael; Dang, Hoang Bao; Göbel, Jens Christian; Savarino, Philipp

doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.029

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the unwillingness of users to participate in the collection of data along with the role that they play in generating and sharing it, is still a concern (Field et al , 2018). Nevertheless, if the provider remains the product owner and the partnership relies on availability (Mert et al , 2016), it will be possible to retrieve valuable information about in-use performance and surrounding influences (Abramovici et al 2016).…”

Section: I40 For Remanufacturing Against the Triple Bottom Linementioning

confidence: 99%

Smart remanufacturing: a review and research framework

Kerin

Pham

2020

JMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo review the state-of-the-art in smart remanufacturing, highlighting key elements of an Industry 4.0 (I4.0) future that supports circular economy (CE) principles and offer a conceptual framework and research agenda to accelerate digitalisation in this sector.Design/methodology/approachThe Scopus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases and search terms “Industry 4.0”, “Internet of things”, “Smart manufacturing” and “Remanufacturing” were used to identify and select publications that had evidence of a relationship between those keywords. The 329 selected papers were reviewed with respect to the triple bottom line (economic, social and environmental). The study benefited from advanced text quantitative processing using NVivo software and a complete manual qualitative assessment.FindingsChanges in product ownership models will affect the remanufacturing industry, with the growth of product-service-systems seen as an opportunity to re-circulate resources and create value. This is being supported by changes in society, user expectations and workforce attributes. Key to the success of remanufacturing in an I4.0 future is the uptake of existing and emerging digital technologies to shorten and strengthen links between product manufacturers, users and remanufacturers.Originality/valueRemanufacturing is recognised as a key CE strategy, which in turn is an important research area for development in our society. This article is the first to study “smart remanufacturing” for the CE. Its uniqueness lies in its focus on the remanufacturing industry and the sustainable application of I4.0 enablers. The findings are used to create a framework that links to the research agenda needed to realise smart remanufacturing.

show abstract

Section: I40 For Remanufacturing Against the Triple Bottom Linementioning

confidence: 99%

Smart remanufacturing: a review and research framework

Kerin

Pham

2020

JMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Characteristic features of Smart Products are their capability to communicate and interact with their environment and other Smart Products by using Internet-based services [1]. They have a high degree of personalization and autonomy, a large number of multidisciplinary components, the ability to react in real-time and their dynamic reconfiguration potential during their whole lifetime [2]. Especially the high amount of software components enables a tremendous potential for IT-based reconfiguration, e.g.…”

Section: Configuration Of Traditional and Reconfiguration Of Smart Prmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Smart Product Lifecycle Management with an Integrated Reconfiguration Management

Abramovici¹,

Göbel²,

Savarino³

et al. 2017

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent ICT innovations determine dramatically changes of traditional products towards intelligent, connected Smart Products. These productrelated changes also imply the need for a fundamental adaption and enhancement of traditional Product Lifecycle Management approaches. Analyzing the main characteristics of Smart Products reveals that lifecycle management approaches for Smart Products especially have to extend their focus on the product use phase. A core challenge in this context is to provide suitable methods and IT tools for the reconfiguration of Smart Products across different engineering domains. This contribution introduces a conceptual approach for the reconfiguration of Smart Products, which considers the dynamical changes of virtual and physical product instances based on the virtual product twin. This approach was implemented and validated prototypically in a model-environment considering smart vehicles, that where temporarily reconfigured during their use phase

show abstract