Systematized Active Power Control of PMSG-Based Wind-Driven Generators

Ramachandran, Vijayapriya; Raja, P.; Selvan, M. P.

doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2912412

Cited by 9 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, the GSC CB of PV arrays DGSs using PI control [99], adaptive PI control [100] and LBAC [103] offers lower settling times, that is, 0.09, 0.074 and 0.02 s, respectively (Figure 14a) than those achieved with the PI [68], dual dq theory [69], SOS‐PI [72] and GWO‐PI [72] control techniques for the WTs DGSs, that is, 0.2, 0.9, 1.51 and 1.21 s, respectively (Figure 11c). Similarly, the GSC CB of PV arrays systems implemented using FLC [104] and PR control [110] respectively presents much lower THDs of 0.26% and 0.23% (Figure 14c) unlike various advanced GSC CBs of WTs DGSs, for example, APRG [73], FIR [74], MPC [79] etc. as shown in Figure 11a.…”

Section: Comparative Discussion On Control Of Wts and Pv Arrays Gener...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, the magnitude of negative-sequence current achieved using proposed feedforward FLC (i.e. 4.2 A) is less than the conventional dq control [31,73], which suffers from 7 A. However, the improved FRT performance is only validated via MATLAB/Simulink environment without providing experimental investigations [127].…”

Section: Control Techniques For Msc Cb Rsc Cb and Gsc Cb Under Non-mp...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the future, the PCB using individual control techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] is not much suitable for the recent large-scale WTs in many cases. This is because the WTs are complicated electromechanical configurations and are easily affected by the varying Rated V dc (V) 700 [78] 1200 [11,48] 700 [86], 750 [98], 230 [108] dc-link capacitor (μF) 60,000 [9], 3300 [78] 10,000 [48] 2200 [4], 2860 [108], 6000 [86], 5000 [105] Typical V sgabc (kV) 6.6 [29], 11.4 [33] 2 5 [ 12], 120 [30] 120 [102], 6.6 [105] Typical V pgabc (V) 575 [9] or 690 [73] 575 [11], 690 [31] 415 [4,86], 380 [98] PCS V W conditions. Thus, the hybrid/integrated control techniquesbased improved PCB as proposed in [136] can be extensively explored for the speed control of future WTs.…”

Section: Wind Turbines Generation Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dc‐link voltage of the BTB power converter and reactive power absorption/injection to the utility grid are controlled using dc‐link VC, QC and CC of the GSC CB, respectively. The important control techniques used to implement VC/QC are PI control [68], dual dq theory‐based control [69], quasi‐centralized direct‐MPC (QC‐DMPC) [70], fractional‐order PI (FOPI) control [71], symbiotic organisms search‐based PI (SOS‐PI) control [72] and steady‐state active power reference generation (APRG) control [73]. Finally, the endorsed modern CCs of the GSC CB for the grid‐side current control are made up of repetitive control [74], SMC [75], second‐order SMC (SOSMC) [76], direct power control (DPC) [77] and MPC [78, 79].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A state‐of‐the‐art comprehensive review of modern control techniques for grid‐connected wind turbines and photovoltaic arrays distributed generation systems

Basit

Nguyen

Ryu

et al. 2022

IET Renewable Power Gen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a state-of-the-art comprehensive review of the modern control techniques for the widely recommended two distributed generation systems (DGSs) using permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG)-and doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG)-based wind turbines (WTs) and photovoltaic (PV) arrays in grid-connected applications. The already published review papers individually study each DGS and also lack a systematic discussion on the control techniques without any suitable classification. This makes it difficult to study the comparatively improved performance of each control technique and comprehensively understand the control requirements of overall DGSs. Unlike existing literature, this paper first distinctively presents the generalized control configurations for both DGSs in the form of control blocks (CBs). Second, the modern control techniques suggested for each DGS are uniquely classified based on the CBs. Third, each CB is studied in detail considering its required control operation for the particular DGS component and recently proposed control techniques for its implementation. Furthermore, a detailed data analysis and comparative graphical illustrations are provided to appropriately study the merits and demerits of every state-of-the-art control technique. Finally, the useful future research directions are presented to realize improved hardware components and control techniques for the grid-connected WTs and PV arrays DGSs.

show abstract

Section: Comparative Discussion On Control Of Wts and Pv Arrays Gener...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Control Techniques For Msc Cb Rsc Cb and Gsc Cb Under Non-mp...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Wind Turbines Generation Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A state‐of‐the‐art comprehensive review of modern control techniques for grid‐connected wind turbines and photovoltaic arrays distributed generation systems

Basit

Nguyen

Ryu

et al. 2022

IET Renewable Power Gen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This reveals that the solar PV array and wind energy sources are the most prominent technology among the RES. In the class of variable speed wind turbine generators, the direct‐drive permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) is growing share due to its exceptional features such as higher operating efficiency, seamless grid interfacing over a wide range of speed, and better fault ride‐through capability [2 ]. However, the intermittent nature of solar and wind power sources has caused voltage fluctuations at the DC link.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%