2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematizing serendipity for big science infrastructures: The ATTRACT project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2010). Wareham et al. (2021) explored a set of modes in which serendipity can appear in highly technological contexts.…”
Section: Systematic Review Of the Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2010). Wareham et al. (2021) explored a set of modes in which serendipity can appear in highly technological contexts.…”
Section: Systematic Review Of the Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serendipity does not emerge from the systematic application of what is already thought; rather, it emerges from surprise (Cunha et al, 2010). Wareham et al (2021) explored a set of modes in which serendipity can appear in highly technological contexts. Namely, it can be the outcome of a combination of different technologies, the application of a technology to a field that differs from that of the original The concept of serendipity has clear boundaries, meaning it is different from ambiguity (Brown, 2006), providence (de Rond, 2014), accidental occurrences (Brown, 2005), chance events (de Rond, 2014), and randomness (Liu and de Rond, 2016).…”
Section: Red Cluster: Conceptual Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%