Systemic Acquired Resistance Induced by Compatible and Incompatible Tomato Mosaic Viruses Effectively Controls Bacterial Spot and Speck Diseases in Tomato

Shopova, E; Mihailova, Bistra; Todorova, Dessislava; Sergiev, Iskren; Stoimenova, E.

doi:10.3390/agriculture10070302

“…Thus, several authors 1,3,17 , in an extensive review of the subject, argue that the plant defence system contains a combination of physical and biochemical changes 11,18 , the former including lignification, cell wall hardening, papilla formation, the latter comprising oxidative burst, accumulation of phytoalexins and activation of pathogenesis-related proteins (PRPs) such as chitinases, β-1,3-glucanases and peroxidases 1,18,19 . Activation of defence responses can be achieved by treatment with biotic agents 20 , avirulent forms of pathogens, incompatible strains, in certain circumstances by virulent forms of pathogens, essential oils 17 , plant extracts, fungi 21 , bacteria 18,22 , viruses 23 , abiotic agents 24,25 and others 26 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluación de cuatro bioestimulantes en la inducción de la resistencia sistémica en pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) y tomate (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) en monocultivo y cultivo asociado en invernadero

Gabriel-Ortega¹,

Pionce²,

Campana³

et al. 2022

J. Selva Andina Res. Soc.

0

1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to evaluate four biostimulants in the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation, five treatments were applied at three developmental stages (growth, flowering and fruiting): T1 Bioremedy (2.0 g/L), T2 Grandsil (2.0 g/L), T3 Control (water), T4 Fossil (5.0 g/L), T5 L-amino (2 cm 3 /L). The treatments were distributed in a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and evaluated in a completely randomised experimental design. Each experimental unit consisted of three rows. The response variables were: plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), number of fruits per plant, fruit volume (cm 3 ) and fruit weight (kg). The results, cucumber in monoculture did not present notable differences for any of the evaluated variables, with the exception of plant height, significant differences were observed at P<0.05 of probability, Bioremedy, L-amino and control were the best. In tomato monoculture, there were significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables, with Bioremedy standing out for plant height, stem diameter, fruit weight, fruit diameter and fruit number. In the associated crop, both cucumber and tomato had significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables evaluated, with Bioremedy being the best.

show abstract

Limonene anti-TMV activity and its mode of action

Luo

¹

,

Wang

²

,

Luo

³

et al. 2023

Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of four biostimulants for the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation

Gabriel-Ortega

¹

,

Pionce²,

Campana

³

et al. 2022

J. Selva Andina Res. Soc.

0

1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to evaluate four biostimulants in the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation, five treatments were applied at three developmental stages (growth, flowering and fruiting): T1 Bioremedy (2.0 g/L), T2 Grandsil (2.0 g/L), T3 Control (water), T4 Fossil (5.0 g/L), T5 L-amino (2 cm 3 /L). The treatments were distributed in a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and evaluated in a completely randomised experimental design. Each experimental unit consisted of three rows. The response variables were: plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), number of fruits per plant, fruit volume (cm 3 ) and fruit weight (kg). The results, cucumber in monoculture did not present notable differences for any of the evaluated variables, with the exception of plant height, significant differences were observed at P<0.05 of probability, Bioremedy, L-amino and control were the best. In tomato monoculture, there were significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables, with Bioremedy standing out for plant height, stem diameter, fruit weight, fruit diameter and fruit number. In the associated crop, both cucumber and tomato had significant differences at P<0.05 for all the variables evaluated, with Bioremedy being the best.

show abstract

Systemic Acquired Resistance Induced by Compatible and Incompatible Tomato Mosaic Viruses Effectively Controls Bacterial Spot and Speck Diseases in Tomato

Cited by 3 publications

References 41 publications

Evaluación de cuatro bioestimulantes en la inducción de la resistencia sistémica en pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) y tomate (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) en monocultivo y cultivo asociado en invernadero

Evaluación de cuatro bioestimulantes en la inducción de la resistencia sistémica en pepino (Cucumis sativus L.) y tomate (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) en monocultivo y cultivo asociado en invernadero

Limonene anti-TMV activity and its mode of action

Evaluation of four biostimulants for the induction of systemic resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) in monoculture and associated greenhouse cultivation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About