2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3723435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Illiquidity in the Interbank Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider first a nominal scenario over a single period T = 1, in which e(0)=(105, 25, 10,190,10,120,0) . In this case, with no control, all nodes default.…”
Section: A Nominal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider first a nominal scenario over a single period T = 1, in which e(0)=(105, 25, 10,190,10,120,0) . In this case, with no control, all nodes default.…”
Section: A Nominal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such concerns can lead to precautionary liquidity hoarding, which restricts the supply of funding (Acharya and Merrouche, 2012;Gale and Yorulmazer, 2013;Heider et al, 2015). In such a scenario, systemic illiquidity can propagate through the network of financial institutions (Ferrara et al, 2017). In this light, the ESRB's surveys on second-round effects attempt to quantify the tendency of institutions to herd into strategies that might cause funding problems to spread between institutions during an adverse macroeconomic scenario.…”
Section: Liquidity Hoardingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Billio et al (2012) study the financial crisis of 2007, focusing on the interconnectedness among hedge funds, banks, brokers, and insurance companies, and propose five measures of systemic risk based on statistical relations among the market returns of these institutions. More recently, Ferrara et al (2018) study the systemic illiquidity using data from Bank of England.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%