2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12055-021-01301-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic inflammatory changes and their clinical implications following thoracic cancer surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the Danish Trial [9][10][11] showed that MIS was preferred over the open approach (84% and 16%, respectively). MIS results in less post-operative pain via a reduction in the immune-mediated inflammatory reaction [70][71][72], resulting in early discharge; quicker functional recovery, and hence rapid return to daily living activities [73][74][75]; and improved aesthetic results [76]. In our study, surgeons preferred an MIS approach, either by RATS or VATS, to thoracotomy (84 vs. 12%), as in the Danish trial, but with RATS being the most predominant (56%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…On the other hand, the Danish Trial [9][10][11] showed that MIS was preferred over the open approach (84% and 16%, respectively). MIS results in less post-operative pain via a reduction in the immune-mediated inflammatory reaction [70][71][72], resulting in early discharge; quicker functional recovery, and hence rapid return to daily living activities [73][74][75]; and improved aesthetic results [76]. In our study, surgeons preferred an MIS approach, either by RATS or VATS, to thoracotomy (84 vs. 12%), as in the Danish trial, but with RATS being the most predominant (56%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%