2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic mechanisms and effects of ionizing radiation: A new ⿿old⿿ paradigm of how the bystanders and distant can become the players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
77
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
2
77
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to the direct exposure of blood which was passing through the exposure area at the time of radiation and possibly due to bystander effect. Similar observations have been previously proved under in vitro and ex vivo conditions [39][40][41][42] . Considering all the results, our study indicates that the normal cells get adapted to damage due to multiple low dose exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This could be due to the direct exposure of blood which was passing through the exposure area at the time of radiation and possibly due to bystander effect. Similar observations have been previously proved under in vitro and ex vivo conditions [39][40][41][42] . Considering all the results, our study indicates that the normal cells get adapted to damage due to multiple low dose exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In parallel, we further explored the validity of one of the aforementioned derived DE gene lists, particularly the one formed from the union of bystander comparisons from the GSE18760, GSE12435 and GSE8993 datasets, with a reference literature-mined gene list regarding RIBE, proposed by the study of Nikitaki et.al [45]. From this comparison, 22 from the 74 genes were identified as common, including mostly interleukins, chemokines and genes associated with apoptosis ( Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a close collaboration with Iliakis' (Germany), Ravanat's (France), and Martin's (Australia) groups, the DNA Damage Laboratory of A. Georgakilas (NTUA, Greece) has proposed an improvement of methodologies used for the detection of oxidative clustered DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo with special emphasis on the in situ detection including bystander effects [62][63][64][65]. In addition, bioinformatics has been used to better understand the DNA damage response mechanisms relating to ionizing radiationinduced DNA damage and their association with inflammatory and immune response pathways [66][67][68][69][70][71]. Collaboration between the groups of Monari and Dumont (France), and the Georgakilas group, through the application of Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, gave mechanistic insights on the processing of clustered DNA lesions especially for cases where it is very difficult to acquire analytical experimental data [72,73].…”
Section: Working Group 2: Models Of Dna Damage and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few exceptions that have been examined in these papers. In addition, through the use of Monte Carlo (MD) simulations, a special biophysical model was developed for the simulation of radiation-induced systemic effects and the interpretation of various nontargeted effects [67]. Last but not least, in a series of publications, Georgakilas' group within its participation in the network of the Halifax Project contributed toward the designing of a broad-spectrum integrative approach for cancer prevention and treatment as reviewed in [73,74].…”
Section: Working Group 2: Models Of Dna Damage and Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%