# We reviewed the health complaints with employees and management.# We inspected the work area and observed work practices.# We talked with workers about their concerns.# We measured airborne concentrations of some chemicals.
What NIOSH Found# All measured air concentrations were below applicable limits.# Gloves were not cleaned or maintained properly.# Air purifying respirators were being worn although a respirator program had not been established.
What Future Aviation ManagersCan Do On June 16-17, 1999, NIOSH investigators conducted an initial site visit at Future Aviation, Inc. The purpose of this site visit was to inspect the facility, observe work practices and chemical handling activities, and monitor exposures to selected workplace compounds. On June 17, 1999, full-shift personal breathing zone (PBZ) samples for petroleum solvents were collected on five workers. A 1.5 hour activity-specific PBZ sample was also collected on one worker while he cleaned a wheel hub with solvent in a wash tank. Bulk samples were collected from both wash tanks in the Test Area, and work practices, including the use of personal protective equipment, were observed. Safety procedures, policies, and employee training programs were also reviewed. Local exhaust ventilation systems at various workstations were evaluated.All exposures were below the applicable NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) on the day of the monitoring. The highest full-shift total hydrocarbon concentration (57.1 milligrams per cubic meter [mg/m 3 ]) was from the worker cleaning generators in the Test Area. The highest total hydrocarbon concentration (211.5 mg/m 3 ) was measured on the worker cleaning the wheel hub. The NIOSH REL for total hydrocarbon is 350 mg/m 3 as a full-shift time-weighted average.On October 19, 1999, a follow-up site visit was conducted to measure exposure to isocyanate-containing compounds during the spray painting and foam packaging operations. Two PBZ exposure measurements were collected from the painter. No 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) monomer was detected, and the HDI-based polyisocyanate exposures were 10.7 and 5.1 micrograms per cubic meter of air (:g/m 3 ). HDI monomer was detected in only one of the seven area air samples collected during spray painting; a concentration of 0.4 :g/m 3 was found at the curing oven doors. Also, HDI-based polyisocyanate concentrations were below the minimum detectable concentration (MDC) of 1.6 :g/m 3 in the area air samples.Foam packaging occurred three times during the October sampling. A 10-minute PBZ exposure measurement was collected each time the foam system was used. The foamer's 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) exposures were 3.5 :g/m 3 , 5.2 :g/m
3, and "none detected" (< 2.6 :g/m 3 ). MDI-based polyisocyanate was not detected in any