2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of early and late implant failure in smokers was 2.4 and 3.0 times higher than in non-smokers, respectively. Several studies have also demonstrated that a smoking habit reduced the success rate of osseointegration [9,11,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of early and late implant failure in smokers was 2.4 and 3.0 times higher than in non-smokers, respectively. Several studies have also demonstrated that a smoking habit reduced the success rate of osseointegration [9,11,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking has also been associated with poorer healing after mucogingival surgery due to more frequent occurrence of refractory periodontitis [29,30]. Several studies also demonstrated that smoking was a risk factor for marginal bone loss [13,[31][32][33] or implant loss [18,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although dental implant therapy has been described as safe and has a high success rate, there are certain conditions that can interfere in the predictability of outcomes. 2 In this context, hyperglycaemia has been linked to an increased risk of T2DM co-morbidities, including reduced bone turnover and impaired bone mineralization and density. 3,4 Indeed, the poor glycaemic control in diabetic patients appears to negatively interfere with bone repair around implants and compromises implant stability during the healing period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 This discrepancy may be the result of implant, clinical, and patient-related factors that are reported to cause marginal bone loss. 23 Two implants can adequately support a three-unit fixed partial prosthesis, which might create a bone stress comparable to that calculated for connected crowns supported by three implants. 24 Thus it appears inappropriate to attribute the excess bone loss to the fixed bridge design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%