2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic stereoselectivity study of flufiprole: Stereoselective bioactivity, acute toxicity and environmental fate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stereoisomers may differ in their ability to bind to the target biological receptor due to their different absolute molecular configurations. For example, (R)‐flufiprole is better able to block the passage of chloride ions in the γ‐aminobutyric acid receptor, which resulted in a higher bioactivity of (R)‐flufiprole than (S)‐flufiprole toward agricultural pests . The stereoselective bioactivity of bitertanol stereoisomers correlated with the binding distance and calculated energy difference between the stereoisomers and the target protein .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Stereoisomers may differ in their ability to bind to the target biological receptor due to their different absolute molecular configurations. For example, (R)‐flufiprole is better able to block the passage of chloride ions in the γ‐aminobutyric acid receptor, which resulted in a higher bioactivity of (R)‐flufiprole than (S)‐flufiprole toward agricultural pests . The stereoselective bioactivity of bitertanol stereoisomers correlated with the binding distance and calculated energy difference between the stereoisomers and the target protein .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tian et al . reported that R‐flufiprole was approximately 3.7–5.7 times more toxic to Scenedesmus obliquus and Trichogramma japonicum Ashmead than the S‐flufiprole . Therefore, individual stereoisomers of the chiral pesticides showed distinct acute toxicities against different non‐target organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,4 Based on chemical structures, pyrethroids are classified into type I and type II categories. [6][7][8] The enantioselective accumulation, degradation, metabolism, and toxicity of pyrethroid enantiomers have been widely studied in recent years. 5 Structurally, pyrethroids contain 1 to 3 asymmetric carbon atoms and result in 1 to 4 pairs of enantiomers, which generally exhibit similar physicochemical and chemical properties in nonchiral environment and different bioactivities in organisms because of different interaction capabilities between enantiomers and naturally chiral biomolecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%