2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60088-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic tolerability of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy with index-of-reactivity–standardized allergen extracts administered using clustered regimens: a retrospective, observational, multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported rate of systemic reactions per injection has been variable from 0.06% to 2.033% [9,11,13,19,31,32,35,39,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. Our frequency of SRs was 0.21% and within the range reported by several studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported rate of systemic reactions per injection has been variable from 0.06% to 2.033% [9,11,13,19,31,32,35,39,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. Our frequency of SRs was 0.21% and within the range reported by several studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This form of therapy has a potential risk of serious systemic reactions, as it involves subcutaneous injection of allergen extracts to which the patients is sensitive [10]. Despite clear advances in the prevention of such reactions, varying rates of severs reactions have been reported since the introduction of standardized and more potent extracts [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rush schedules were less strongly associated with SRs. Although contradictory data have been published , these differences could be due to the type of extract associated preferentially with each protocol. Sensitization to animal dander or pollen, regardless of whether or not these allergens were present in the AIT formulation used. These findings emphasized the importance of correct patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 A review that used the 2006 EAACI grading system comparing the safety of different cluster schedules reported that 16% of systemic adverse reactions were grade 0, which is defined as ''no symptoms or nonspecific symptoms.'' 23 Moreover, investigators of SCIT studies develop their own unique classification systems for grading SRs. 24 This variability and lack of uniformity in classifying SCIT SR make it impossible to compare the safety results in one trial versus another.…”
Section: Current Classification Systems For Grading Scit Sr: History mentioning
confidence: 99%