2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems analysis and cost estimates for large scale capture of carbon dioxide from air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With such a wide range of estimated capital costs, there is no consensus on the economic feasibility of DAC. For example, Simon et al (2011) argued DAC can be a cost-effective contributor to climate mitigation in the future, while Ranjan and Herzog (2011) found that the costs of DAC systems is prohibitively high compared to other mitigation options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With such a wide range of estimated capital costs, there is no consensus on the economic feasibility of DAC. For example, Simon et al (2011) argued DAC can be a cost-effective contributor to climate mitigation in the future, while Ranjan and Herzog (2011) found that the costs of DAC systems is prohibitively high compared to other mitigation options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the upper range of these energy requirements, the system only effectively captures CO 2 when a renewable energy source is used. The majority of these studies on the energy requirements of DAC systems, however, are simple energy assessments based on thermodynamic principles and reaction enthalpies instead of outdoor prototypes (House et al 2011, Simon et al 2011, McGlashan et al 2012, Lackner 2013, Wilcox et al 2017.These studies often only include the capture and regeneration step of the DAC systems and thus neglect the energy use from CO 2 transportation and storage. Furthermore, by only analysing energy consumption, emissions due to the production and use of materials and chemicals needed are neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the reported costs for DAC are relatively higher, in the range of 150 to 300 € per ton [59][60][61][62][63][64] (the amounts reported originally in USD are converted to € at a 1 € to 1.33 USD conversion rate, for the purpose of this work). Climeworks, as a forerunner in this field, expects to reduce the costs to 75 € per ton for large-scale DAC farms [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon feedstock has to be of biogenic origin [66] or captured from the atmosphere using DAC technologies [67][68][69], to render the fuels GHG-free. The anticipated learning potential as presented by private start-up companies and other sources could lead to average capturing costs below 200, or even 100 Euros/ton of CO 2 captured [57,69], while costs are currently far higher (600-1000 Euros/ton of CO 2 ) [67,68]. Carbon feedstock from biogenic sources proves to be cheaper, in particular when CO 2 is a by-product of another application (biomass used for energy in the paper and pulp industry, biogas upgrading to biomethane, CO 2 capturing in a biomass firing power plant, etc.).…”
Section: Synthetic Fuels Scenario: Hydrogen As a Feedstock For The Prmentioning
confidence: 99%