2004
DOI: 10.1258/1356262042368255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the London protocol

Abstract: The London Protocol is the revised and updated version of our original Protocol for the Investigation and Analysis of Clinical Incidents. 1 The protocol outlined a process of incident investigation and analysis developed in a research context, which was adapted for practical use by risk managers and others trained in incident investigation. This approach has now been refined and developed in the light of experience and research into incident investigation both within and outside healthcare."The purpose of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
182
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
182
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…10 To be rated as 'full', the report of investigations had to identify the errors, themes and contributing factors as well as providing some explanation of any actions taken or shared learning.…”
Section: Quantitative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 To be rated as 'full', the report of investigations had to identify the errors, themes and contributing factors as well as providing some explanation of any actions taken or shared learning.…”
Section: Quantitative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This first phase consists of decision-making regarding incidents for investigation based on the incident severity, the available resources, and the institutional learning potential (4) . In the current study, the analyzed incidents were selected by the researchers according to the greatest frequency of occurrence, the possibility of accessing the clinic patient registries, and the scientific evidence, thereby guaranteeing a greater potential for organizational learning.…”
Section: Identification and Decision To Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group should include no more than three or four lead researchers (4) . Thus, the present research group was composed of three investigators and two nurses from the institution's Quality and Risk Management Department.…”
Section: Group Researcher Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations