1976
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1976-0473334-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems-conjugate and focal points of fourth order nonselfadjoint differential equations

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Systems-conjugate points have been studied by John Barrett in relation to selfadjoint fourth order differential equations of the form (p2u")" + PqU = 0. This paper extends his results to the general nonselfadjoint fourth order differential equation via a system of second order equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in Section 5 we establish two criteria for the existence ofη 1 (a). Similar results were given in [3] and [6] for q(x) ≡ 0 and q(x) ≤ 0, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, in Section 5 we establish two criteria for the existence ofη 1 (a). Similar results were given in [3] and [6] for q(x) ≡ 0 and q(x) ≤ 0, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…At the end of this work, he applied his results to equation (1.1) for q(x) ≤ 0 and the additional condition p − q ′′ /2 + q 2 /4r > 0. Note that the systems-focal point studied in [6] do not coincide with that defined above for (1.1) only for q ≡ const.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We remark that the particular choice of °U* in Corollary 4.2 was rather arbitrary -other combinations of zero and natural boundary conditions could also be used. However, this particular class leads to a natural generalization of the notion of systems zeros introduced by Barrett [3] and studied by Cheng [6] and Schmitt and Smith [22]. Also, for n = 2 they reduce to y(a) = y£(a) = 0 = y(b) = y*(b)> where y* = p 2 y"-As such, the prototype inequality of §1 is a very special case of Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Natural Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore C(v o ) cannot go directly from II to I to II. Under the hypotheses b{i) > 0 and c(t) > 0, recent results in[2] can also be specialised to the system (2.1). Let C(0 O ) denote the trajectory of (2.1) satisfying and tan 0 O = ¥~ with -<9 0 <n. THEOREM 2.2(Cheng).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%