2019
DOI: 10.25205/1818-7900-2019-17-2-61-73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems for Automated Evaluation of Programming Tasks: Development, Use and Perspectives

Abstract: The paper is devoted to the issues related to the development and use of automated assessment systems for programming tasks. The work on automated testing of programming tasks had been held in Novosibirsk State University since 1998. It was created several generations of systems of this type. The first program of about 1,000 lines was written in Perl. Currently, the automated system, named NSUts, is used in the programming contests and in the educational process. As a result of work in it, as well as acquainta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this model, the software is not installed on users' computers, but on the provider's servers, and the user does not have any access to the system. This disadvantage makes the system unsuitable for longterm contests due to the fact that the terms of the service provider can change at any moment and the user (in our case, the organizer of the contest) will not be able to do anything [2]. One of the most successful systems in history was PCSM2, which was formed by combining the APPES and PCMS systems and is characterized by the flexibility of the internal structure.…”
Section: Development Of a System For Conducting Checking And Evaluati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this model, the software is not installed on users' computers, but on the provider's servers, and the user does not have any access to the system. This disadvantage makes the system unsuitable for longterm contests due to the fact that the terms of the service provider can change at any moment and the user (in our case, the organizer of the contest) will not be able to do anything [2]. One of the most successful systems in history was PCSM2, which was formed by combining the APPES and PCMS systems and is characterized by the flexibility of the internal structure.…”
Section: Development Of a System For Conducting Checking And Evaluati...mentioning
confidence: 99%