Systems integration to promote the mental health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children: protocol for a community-driven continuous quality improvement approach

Abstract

Background Systems integration to promote the mental health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children works towards developing a spectrum of effective, community-based services and supports. These services and supports are organised into a coordinated network, build meaningful partnerships with families and address their cultural and linguistic needs, to help children to function better at home, in school, in the community, and throughout life. This study is conducted in partnership with primary healthcare (PHC) and other services in three diverse Indigenous Australian communities. It entails conceptualising, co-designing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of systems integration to promote the mental health and wellbeing of Indigenous school-aged children (4–17 years). This paper outlines a protocol for implementing such complex community-driven research. Methods/design Using continuous quality improvement processes, community co-designed strategies for improved systems integration will be informed by narratives from yarning circles with Indigenous children and service providers, and quantitative data from surveys of service providers and audits of PHC client records and intersectoral systems. Agreed strategies to improve the integration of community-based services and supports will be modelled using microsimulation software, with a preferred model implemented in each community. The evaluation will investigate changes in the: 1) availability of services that are community-driven, youth-informed and culturally competent; 2) extent of collaborative service networks; 3) identification by PHC services of children’s social and emotional wellbeing concerns; and 4) ratio of children receiving services to identified need. Costs and benefits of improvements to systems integration will also be calculated. Discussion The study will provide evidence-informed, community-driven, and tested models that can be used for implementing systems integration to promote the mental health and wellbeing of Indigenous children. It will identify the situational enablers and barriers that impact systems integration and determine the extent to which systems integration improves service availability, systems and child outcomes. Evidence for the cost effectiveness of systems-level integration will contribute to national mental health policy reform.

The Influence of Disney Musical Practice Course on the Mental Health of Chinese Left-Behind Children from the Perspective of Art Communication

“…It is necessary to better understand the characteristics of students' psychological activities and master the process and laws of students' psychological development to create an atmosphere conducive to the healthy and all-around development of students. The goal and content of music education should match the various stages of students' physical and mental development [ 21 ]. The cultural psychology of music education has a strong appeal in terms of academic foundation, values, and changes in postmodern philosophy [ 22 , 23 ].…”

The Availability, Appropriateness, and Integration of Services to Promote Indigenous Australian Youth Wellbeing and Mental Health: Indigenous Youth and Service Provider Perspectives

“…This research was designed as part of a five-year research project to inform the Yarrabah community-driven co-design of improved systems for promoting the mental health of Yarrabah school-aged youth [39]. Ethical approval was provided by Central Queensland University (0000021644), Queensland Education Research Inventory (550/27/2319), Queensland Health Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Services (HREC/2021/QCH78083 (Oct ver 3)-1557), and Queensland Department of Children, Youth Justice and Multicultural Affairs-Child Safety (04458-2021) and Youth Justice (CYJMA 02361-2021).…”

Culturally Safe eHealth Interventions With Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Protocol for a Best Practice Framework

“…Each research phase draws on additional frameworks such as PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) [ 64 ], Delphi approaches [ 65 - 67 ], and scoping frameworks [ 68 - 70 ]. Additional reference has been made to relevant scientific publications regarding the development of practice guidelines [ 71 - 76 ] and health research protocols [ 74 , 77 , 78 ] throughout the development of this protocol. Further details of each of the 7 research phases are outlined as follows.…”