Systems Language for e-Democracy: Personal Resource Systems Management (PRSM), a Model and Action Research

McFall, Barbara; Williams, Stephanie

doi:10.1023/b:spaa.0000040653.41479.e3

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The author's desire to instead see the world through user eyes drove their selection of photoethnography. The choice of systems analysis, and more specifically PRSM, exposes a preference for addressing dynamic wholes rather than static elements, and extends prior research and theoretical development in this area (Mcfall, 1998;Mcfall & Williams, 2004;Mcfall, Beacham, & Shambaugh, 2006).…”

mentioning

confidence: 62%

Ideal Design Programming with Photoethnographic Data and Systems Analysis

McFall

Beacham

2006

Journal of Interior Design

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 62%

Ideal Design Programming with Photoethnographic Data and Systems Analysis

McFall

Beacham

2006

Journal of Interior Design

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Interpretive discourse (Aikens, 1998;Bekkers, 2004;Belanger & Carter, 2006;Berman & Witzner, 1997;Best & Krueger, 2005;Bimber, 2001;Bingham et al, 2005;Carlitz & Gunn, 2002;Chang, 2005;Curwell, Deakin, Cooper, & Paskaleva-Shapira, 2005;Dahlberg, 2001;Drechsler & Madise, 2002;Dutta-Bergman, 2005;Gro¨nlund, 2003b;Hoff et al, 2003;Hudson-Smith et al, 2005;Jensen, 2003a;Johnson & Kaye, 2004;Kenski, 2005;Klein, 1999;Luhrs et al, 2003;Lusoli & Ward, 2004;Macintosh & Smith, 2002a;Mahrer & Krimmer, 2005;McFall & Williams, 2004;Park, 2002;Polat, 2005;Roeder et al, 2005;Rosenblatt, 1999;Schaupp & Lemuria, 2005;Siapera, 2005;Sipior & Ward, 2005;Smith & Clark, 2005;Svensson & Leenes, 2003;Tambouris & Gorilas, 2003;Westholm, 2002;Whyte & Macintosh, 2001;Xenakis & Macintosh, 2005) Evans et al (2004), Fernandez-Maldo...…”

Section: Normative Discourseunclassified

Characterizing eParticipation

Sanford

Rose

2007

International Journal of Information Management

173

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mapping eParticipation Research: Four Central Challenges

Rose¹,

Sanford²

2007

CAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emerging research area of eParticipation can be characterized as the study of technologyfacilitated citizen participation in (democratic) deliberation and decision-making. Using conventional literature study techniques, we identify 105 articles that are considered to be highly relevant to eParticipation. We develop a definitional schema that suggests different ways of understanding an emerging socio-technical research area and use this schema to map the research contributions identified. This allows us make an initial sketch of the scientific character of the area and its central concerns, theories, and methods. We extend the analysis to define four central research challenges for the field: understanding technology and participation; the strategic challenge; the design challenge; and the evaluation challenge. This article thus contributes to a developing account of eParticipation, which will help future researchers both to navigate the research area and to focus their research agendas.

show abstract

Systems Language for e-Democracy: Personal Resource Systems Management (PRSM), a Model and Action Research

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Ideal Design Programming with Photoethnographic Data and Systems Analysis

Ideal Design Programming with Photoethnographic Data and Systems Analysis

Characterizing eParticipation

Mapping eParticipation Research: Four Central Challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About