Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health 2001 series. Volume I. Wraparound: Stories from the field.

Kendziora, Kimberly; Burns, E.; Osher, David; Pacchiano, Debra; Mejia, Brenda

doi:10.1037/e359502004-001

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The systems of care philosophy overlaps in many ways with the value base of wraparound in that both seek to promote service approaches that are family driven, strengths based, individualized, flexible, and coordinated (Center for Mental Health Services, 1998). The sample included teams from eight programs which, by virtue of being cited as promising practices by CMHS (e.g., Kendziora et al, 2001), have been held up as models for wraparound and/or other system of care practices consistent with the wraparound philosophy.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The model also highlights the potential for increased diversity among team members to positively impact the range of options and perspectives considered by the team, and hence the creativity and quality of ideas and strategies. As other discussions of wraparound have pointed out, it seems particularly likely that plans will contain an optimal balance of formal, community, and natural supports and services when members of the family's informal support networks are included on the team (Kendziora, Bruns, Osher, Pacchiano, & Mejia, 2001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality and Individualization in Wraparound Team Planning

Walker

Schutte

2005

J Child Fam Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In children's mental health, collaborative, team-based individualized service planning is most commonly known as wraparound, and has become one of the primary strategies for improving services and outcomes for children with the highest levels of need. We report on analyses of data gathered at 72 wraparound team meetings from communities around the United States. We describe the composition of the teams and the quality of the planning process they engaged in, and explore the extent to which these factors were associated with team member satisfaction and the individualization of plans. Teams in our study were numerically dominated by professionals. Parents attended a large majority of meetings, participation by youth and family advocates was frequent, participation by other family members infrequent, and participation by other members of the family's informal or natural support networks rare. Observed teams varied considerably in the quality of their planning process and the degree of individualization of plans. Higherquality planning was significantly associated with increased individualization of plans and with team member satisfaction with meeting productivity. KEY WORDS: wraparound; individualization; team; planning; community-based.In recent years, collaborative family-provider teams have become increasingly popular as a mechanism for creating and implementing individualized plans of care for children and families with complex needs. This sort of team-based planning is currently in use in a variety of human service contexts, including special

show abstract

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Quality and Individualization in Wraparound Team Planning

Walker

Schutte

2005

J Child Fam Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The team’s goal is to develop a plan tailored uniquely to the child and family, including not only their needs but also their strengths (Burns and Goldman 1999; Handron et al 1998; Kendziora et al 2001;VanDenBerg and Grealish 1996). In principle, within family-centered systems, family members are full partners in defining needs and making decisions about the plan of care which, in turn, matches the family’s needs and circumstances (Cook and Kilmer 2004; Tolan and Dodge 2005).…”

Section: Brief Background On Systems Of Care and Wraparoundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving from Principles to Practice: Recommended Policy Changes to Promote Family‐Centered Care

Kilmer

Cook

Munsell

2010

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper emphasizes the value of family-centered care. Discussion highlights family-centered philosophies (e.g., Systems of Care [SOCs]) and practice models (i.e., wraparound) and identifies discrepancies between conceptualizations and actual practice. Data from multiple sources detail issues in fidelity to family-centered values and needs and risks experienced by siblings of children with severe emotional disturbance and their caregivers. This discussion provides a springboard for policy recommendations to strengthen family support programming and enhance family-centered care, from modifying funding streams such that systems extend their reach beyond children with full-blown, diagnosable problems (those meeting standards of “medical necessity), to supporting prevention and early intervention initiatives that address families as targets for intervention. Recommendations include ensuring that communities with SOC funding address the needs of families; broadening Medic-aid rules and definitions; expanding the range of reimbursable activities and services; and increasing funding for evaluating family-centered care models and family support programming.

show abstract

“…Manuals were re quested from national-level trainers with experience at numerous sites and from well-regarded wraparound programs. Two methods were used to identify well-regarded wrap around programs: nomination by the PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES ♦ ps.psychiatryonline.org national-level trainers or recognition by the Center for Mental Health Services for having implemented promising practices related to wrap around (25)(26)(27) The first draft of the practice mod el organized wraparound activities into four phases: engagement, initial plan development, plan implementa tion, and transition. The resulting practice model was sent out for re view and comment by ten additional reviewers, primarily administrators of wraparound programs widely rec ognized as exemplars of high-quality practice and including five from the well-regarded programs previously identified.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building on Practice-Based Evidence: Using Expert Perspectives to Define the Wraparound Process

Walker¹,

Bruns²

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: In order to expand the research base on effective communi ty-based mental health treatments, methods are needed to define and evaluate promising interventions that have not been systematically de veloped and tested. In this report, the authors describe the results of an effort to better define the wraparound process for children and adoles cents with serious emotional and behavioral problems.

show abstract

Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health 2001 series. Volume I. Wraparound: Stories from the field.

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Quality and Individualization in Wraparound Team Planning

Quality and Individualization in Wraparound Team Planning

Moving from Principles to Practice: Recommended Policy Changes to Promote Family‐Centered Care

Building on Practice-Based Evidence: Using Expert Perspectives to Define the Wraparound Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About