2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.15.3155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems Pathology Approach for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Progression After Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract: The integration of clinicopathologic variables with imaging and biomarker data (systems pathology) resulted in a highly accurate tool for predicting CF within 5 years after prostatectomy. The data support a role for AR signaling in clinical progression and duration of response to ADT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
89
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several new molecular markers, including early prostate cancer antigen (EPCA-2), the PCA3 urine test, TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusions, and androgen receptor content, appear promising in identifying indolent tumors [23][24][25][26], but at present, their ability to add additional predictive value above that contained in the clinical parameters (tumor volume, grade, stage, and PSA) on which the Epstein criteria are based is limited [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several new molecular markers, including early prostate cancer antigen (EPCA-2), the PCA3 urine test, TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusions, and androgen receptor content, appear promising in identifying indolent tumors [23][24][25][26], but at present, their ability to add additional predictive value above that contained in the clinical parameters (tumor volume, grade, stage, and PSA) on which the Epstein criteria are based is limited [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High expression levels of the AR protein in patients treated with radical prostatectomy before ADT have been associated with worse overall and disease-specific survival and shorter time to disease relapse (reviewed in Donovan et al (2008Donovan et al ( , 2010 and Hodgson et al (2012)). We showed a similar finding for patients with locally obstructive HN PC treated by palliative TURP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, to our knowledge, no AURKA SNPs have been reported in any prostate cancer genome wide association studies. Further studies are necessary given the prognostic utility of SNPs in predicting cancer risk and recurrence [11,12], based on the premise that these SNP studies will enhance the accuracy of existing prognostic nomograms that incorporate clinical variables such as clinical stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%