1973
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(73)90520-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systolic time intervals in constrictive pericarditis and severe primary myocardial disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been reviewed in detail by Harris (1974), and shown to be true not only for primary myocardial disease (Spodick et al, 1972;Armstrong et al, 1973), but also for the myocardial disease occurring in hypertension (Tarazi et al, 1969), valvar heart disease, or coronary artery disease (Jezek, 1963;Pouget et al, 1971;Meng et al, 1976). However, analysis of the underlying disturbance has been limited by difficulties in the definition of myocardial contractility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been reviewed in detail by Harris (1974), and shown to be true not only for primary myocardial disease (Spodick et al, 1972;Armstrong et al, 1973), but also for the myocardial disease occurring in hypertension (Tarazi et al, 1969), valvar heart disease, or coronary artery disease (Jezek, 1963;Pouget et al, 1971;Meng et al, 1976). However, analysis of the underlying disturbance has been limited by difficulties in the definition of myocardial contractility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ) is followed by a rapid early diastolic ascent, which ends in a premature H wave and plateau contour [5, 9,10] (the X descent is variable, but may be well preserved). This sign corre sponds to the 'diastolic venous collapse' first described by Friedrich in 1855, and was considered the most con sistent physical sign in CP by Paul Wood [5], Tavel emphasizes the prematurity of the V wave, which in CP precedes A2 or follows it by not more than 0.03 s. Sys tolic time intervals are useful in CP to the extent that a PEP/LVET is less than 0.5 in CP but exceeds 0.5 in car diomyopathy, which may resemble CP in clinical presen tation [12], This criterion was of course more important before the advent of echocardiography than it is now. …”
Section: Phonocardiography and Pulse Tracingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators utilizing adults have reported that the left ventricular systolic time intervals are usually normal in constrictive pericarditis [1,11,18,20]. According to Khullar and Lewis [18] and others [11] evaluating adults, left ventricular systolic time intervals can be used to clearly separate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy patients.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Ejection Phase Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%