T-4G simulator and T-4 ground training devices in USAF undergraduate pilot training.

Woodruff, Robert R.; Smith, James F.

doi:10.1037/e423262004-001

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several benefits have been identified of simulation training; it has been found to be effective [14] [15]; it encourages positive transfer of learning from the simulated training scenario to the real life situation [16]; simulation training offers a risk free environment in which trainees can encounter potentially dangerous/hazardous/life threatening situations [17]; simulation training is found to be cost effective [18] and it improves decision making [19]. Absolute simulation fidelity is not required for skills to be transferrable [20] [21].…”

Section: The Pedagogic Tool Of Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Team Training in Safety and Security via Simulation: A Practical Dimension of Maritime Education and Training

Baldauf¹,

Dalaklis²,

Kataria

2016

INTED2016 Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the rather extended maritime domain, a term that should be the epicentre of any successful careerbuilding path is tailor-made training via cutting-edge simulators. To cut a long story short, the breadth of operations on the various types of ships has expanded to such a large extent that extensive practical training drills are becoming a compelling need to contribute to competent seafarers. This type of training can guarantee the positive outcome in their decision-making process and help the seafarers often being under continuous pressure, to suitably respond to the various safety and security threats on-board a vessel. The several conventions and codes introduced by the International Maritime Organization (IMO)-including MARPOL (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships), SOLAS (International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea), but moreover ISPS Code (International Ship and Port Facility Security Code) and STCW (Standards of Training Certification and Watch-keeping) being probably the most well-known examples both within and outside the maritime community-posing and requesting significant performance demands on crews. Sophisticated simulation series that promote teamwork and cooperation are the tools urgently needed to maximize training efficacy. Handling safety situations under stress (emergency response), crisis management and reactions towards a security incident are important aspects of Maritime Education and Training (MET). The authors' approach to address those aspects utilizes enhanced simulation based team training. They argue that an effective way to gain experience and achieve corresponding skills, are practice runs on specially designed simulators that realistically represent complex conditions on-board vessels, following the respective prompts though realistic scenarios. The concept of a safety & security training simulator is introduced; the research work related to the implementation of a learning objective oriented development of simulation training scenarios and the pedagogic value added by simulation to MET are also discussed. A very important recommendation is that maritime training needs should not be regarded simply as a means to achieve regulatory compliance. The value imparted by simulation as a pedagogic tool to the maritime teaching and learning process is tremendous; adopting the learning objective oriented development of simulation training scenarios in order to effectively address pre-identified learning outcomes is the right methodology to nurture competent seafarers.

show abstract

Section: The Pedagogic Tool Of Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Team Training in Safety and Security via Simulation: A Practical Dimension of Maritime Education and Training

Baldauf¹,

Dalaklis²,

Kataria

2016

INTED2016 Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, a series of studies conducted since 1974 shows that pilot performance in the air is about the same for pilots trained in a simulator without motion compared to other pilots trained in the same simulator with motion (Koonce 1974, Jacobs and Roscoe 1975, Woodruff and Smith 1974, Gray and Fuller 1977, Woodruff et al 1976, and Martin and Waag 1978.…”

Section: IImentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Issues in the Determination of Simulator Fidelity: Proceedings of the ARI Sponsored Workshop 23-24 July, 1981

Hays¹

1981

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proficiency Maintenance and Assessment in an Instrument Flight Simulator

Weitzman¹,

Fineberg²,

Gade³

et al. 1979

Hum Factors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transfer effects have been studied to evaluate the suitability of a high fidelity flight simulator (Device 2B24) for maintaining and assessing instrument proficiency among experienced Army helicopter pilots. Evidence in support of positive transfer was obtained by comparing pilots trained in the simulator with pilots trained in the aircraft (UH-1H) and with pilots trained in both. In addition, performance evaluation in the simulator accurately predicted performance in the aircraft. This study suggests that simulators of proven effectiveness can be used both to maintain and assess the proficiency of experienced pilots.

show abstract

T-4G simulator and T-4 ground training devices in USAF undergraduate pilot training.

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Team Training in Safety and Security via Simulation: A Practical Dimension of Maritime Education and Training

Team Training in Safety and Security via Simulation: A Practical Dimension of Maritime Education and Training

Research Issues in the Determination of Simulator Fidelity: Proceedings of the ARI Sponsored Workshop 23-24 July, 1981

Proficiency Maintenance and Assessment in an Instrument Flight Simulator

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About