2018
DOI: 10.31801/cfsuasmas.478632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T₁ Approach Spaces

Abstract: In this paper, we characterize both T 1 and local T 1 limit (resp. gauge) approach spaces as well as show how these concepts are related to each other. Finally, we compare these T 1 and the usual T 1 approach spaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…□ Remark 1. In [7] and [8] Baran and Qasim gave different definitions of T 0 and T 1 approach spaces. We hope that the characterization given in Proposition 1 will lead a way to give an analogue definition of T 2 spaces (Hausdorff spaces).…”
Section: The Fell Approach Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…□ Remark 1. In [7] and [8] Baran and Qasim gave different definitions of T 0 and T 1 approach spaces. We hope that the characterization given in Proposition 1 will lead a way to give an analogue definition of T 2 spaces (Hausdorff spaces).…”
Section: The Fell Approach Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let L be a value quantale, and let (X, B) be an L-approach space and p ∈ X. Then, the following are equivalent: , then local T 0 (respectively, local T 1 ) L-approach spaces are reduced to classical local T 0 (respectively, local T 1 ) approach spaces defined in [12,13]. A) is an L-approach distance space.…”
Section: Definition 34 [2]mentioning
confidence: 99%