2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2004.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T cell activation: Kinetic proofreading, serial engagement and cell adhesion

Abstract: There is a fundamental difference in complexity between signaling initiated by ligands on the surface of one cell binding to receptors on the surface of another cell and ligands in solution binding to these receptors. The fact that two cells must approach each other and form a number of intercellular bonds of different types, all within the restricted geometry of the intercellular contact region, introduces the possibility of complex spatio-temporal dynamics of surface receptors that is not present otherwise. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of activation of naive T-cell into cytotoxic or T-helper cells, the population of naive T-cells has to pass through the pattern recognition process of the identification of antigenic peptide sequences (self or non-self antigen), which in turn decides whether the naive T-cells will be converted into the active T-cells (which will further proliferate) or inactive Tcells (no further proliferation but the cells will survive) or dead T-cells (which will further trigger apoptotic pathway and cell death) (Carter 2000;Coombs and Goldstein 2005). Hence, certain deregulation of this sensitive mechanism can destabilize our body's immune system and can trigger various diseases, like auto-immune diseases, severe combined immune deficiency syndrome (SCID), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of activation of naive T-cell into cytotoxic or T-helper cells, the population of naive T-cells has to pass through the pattern recognition process of the identification of antigenic peptide sequences (self or non-self antigen), which in turn decides whether the naive T-cells will be converted into the active T-cells (which will further proliferate) or inactive Tcells (no further proliferation but the cells will survive) or dead T-cells (which will further trigger apoptotic pathway and cell death) (Carter 2000;Coombs and Goldstein 2005). Hence, certain deregulation of this sensitive mechanism can destabilize our body's immune system and can trigger various diseases, like auto-immune diseases, severe combined immune deficiency syndrome (SCID), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if it remains bound too long it will activate those it encounters but the frequency of encounters will be small. The recognition that the pMHC-TCR bond half-life has opposing effects on kinetic proofreading and serial engagement led to the prediction that to achieve an optimal rate of TCR activation there should be an optimal half-life, or equivalently an optimal dissociation rate constant k off , (Coombs & Goldstein, 2005;Lanzavecchia et al, 1999). Although some studies have found an optimal half-life for T cell activation (Carreno et al, 2007;Coombs et al, 2002;Kalergis et al, 2001), there are other results that are not consistent with this model (reviewed in (Aleksic et al, 2010;Stone et al, 2009)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the pMHC dissociates too rapidly, it will encounter many TCRs but activate few while if it remains bound too long it will activate those it encounters but encounters will be rare. The recognition that the pMHC-TCR bond half-life has opposite effects on kinetic proofreading and serial engagement led to the proposal that to achieve an optimal rate of TCR activation there should be an optimal half-life, or equivalently an optimal dissociation rate constant k off , [6, 7]. Although some studies have found an optimal half-life for T cell activation [8, 9, 10], there are other results that are inconsistent with this model (reviewed in [11, 12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%