2016
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.182311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T cell adhesion triggers an early signaling pole distal to the immune synapse

Abstract: The immunological synapse forms at the interface between a T cell and an antigen-presenting cell after foreign antigen recognition. The immunological synapse is considered to be the site where the signaling cascade leading to T lymphocyte activation is triggered. Here, we show that another signaling region can be detected before formation of the synapse at the opposite pole of the T cell. This structure appears during the first minute after the contact forms, is transient and contains all the classic component… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this rearward movement has also been reported (27), where F-actin quickly accumulated around IS and pushed the original T cell body away from APCs (63,64). STIM1-Orai1 cap formation on the distal side of T cell body (26), ZAP-70 accumulation on the distal side during TCR engagement (65), and other evidence postulating an antisynapse during early T cell signaling (66) further suggest a more complex spatial role of the mitochondria in calcium buffering during T cell activation than originally postulated; however, many of these studies did not directly monitor mitochondria during T cell activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Interestingly, this rearward movement has also been reported (27), where F-actin quickly accumulated around IS and pushed the original T cell body away from APCs (63,64). STIM1-Orai1 cap formation on the distal side of T cell body (26), ZAP-70 accumulation on the distal side during TCR engagement (65), and other evidence postulating an antisynapse during early T cell signaling (66) further suggest a more complex spatial role of the mitochondria in calcium buffering during T cell activation than originally postulated; however, many of these studies did not directly monitor mitochondria during T cell activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…immune synapse (Guedj et al, 2016). The sequestered Arf6Q67L vacuoles are located at this site and thus are reminiscent of this antisynapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, we note that although perturbing these elements certainly can improve T-cell migration, care must be taken when engineering cells to migrate better, to ensure they retain the ability for adequate activation. For instance, a number of studies have shown that MTs are not required for the immune synapse TCR formation, whereas other studies have suggested MT-dependent synapse behavior, where this may also depend on the type of MTtargeting drug, e.g., examples of immune synapse disruption under nocodazole but not vinblastine [65][66][67][68] . Thus, there likely may be ways to perturb MT stability or MT-associated signaling without loss of immune synapse function; however, either way, perturbing the contractility side of the axis, and likely other adhesion-to-motor elements as well, alleviates potential issues with altered MT dynamics and clearly shows great promise for enhancing T-cell migration in tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%