2001
DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.6.762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T cell control of the gut IgA response against commensal bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current evidence suggests that the majority of IgA molecules in the gut are induced by commensal bacteria and that there is a role for this transient population to induce a specific IgA response. 23,[52][53][54][55][56][57] A recent study performed by Hapfelmeier et al 54 confirms the role of commensal bacteria, but also describes the specific IgA response to be less robust and have a slower onset, consistent with our findings. Another relevant finding by Macpherson et al 23 showed induction of commensal-specific IgA antibodies to be mostly T cell independent but dependent largely on the B1 peritoneal B cells, a potential angle that should be evaluated in rice bran-fed mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Current evidence suggests that the majority of IgA molecules in the gut are induced by commensal bacteria and that there is a role for this transient population to induce a specific IgA response. 23,[52][53][54][55][56][57] A recent study performed by Hapfelmeier et al 54 confirms the role of commensal bacteria, but also describes the specific IgA response to be less robust and have a slower onset, consistent with our findings. Another relevant finding by Macpherson et al 23 showed induction of commensal-specific IgA antibodies to be mostly T cell independent but dependent largely on the B1 peritoneal B cells, a potential angle that should be evaluated in rice bran-fed mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, it is not surprising that most cells emerging from the IPP in sheep are B cells and not T cells (16). It appears then that JPP and "conventional" PP are especially dependent on CD 4 helper T cells, consistent with the concept that 1) the IgA response is T cell-dependent (28,29), 2) IgA responses are dependent on T cell cytokines (30), and 3) rescue from apoptosis depends on CD40/CD40L interactions (31). The T-independent response of mouse peritoneal B1 cells has not been confirmed in other species (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The intestinal microbiota have been demonstrated to be involved in the proper development of the intestinal immune system and in particular in the production of a diverse repertoire of SIgA (4) composed of at least 90% of natural SIgA with largely unknown specificity (8,15,16). The biological function of such SIgA remains speculative; however, various studies have underscored the natural coating of commensal bacteria by SIgA, a process that may be involved in the homeostatic gut sensing of the microbiota (12,41,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%