Purpose
To provide a succinct update on the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the management of patients with aggressive lymphomas. To clarify the indications for allogeneic transplantation vis-à-vis autologous transplant and to discuss the rational and potential benefits of reduced intensity conditioning(RIC), non-myeloablative (NMA) transplant, T-cell depletion and variations in GVHD prophylaxis.
Recent findings
Considerable effort has been spent in developing transplant regimens with reduced toxicity and reduced GVHD. The role of allogeneic transplantation has also been redefined in light of advances in lymphoma classification, diagnostic methods, particularly PET scan and advances in transplant technology. Haplo and UCB SCT allow identification of a donor for nearly all patients.
Summary
RIC and NMA conditioning have reduced early toxicity but are associated with increased risk for disease recurrence. Promising data have been reported from a novel conditioning regimen combining NMAwith ibritumomab tiuxetan. T-cell depletion reduces cGVHD but has some increase in rate of recurrence. Rapamycin may be associated with reduction in risk for disease recurrence. In diffuse large B cell lymphoma, the outcome of allo SCT depends on patient characteristics and chemosensitivity. It is seful after failure of autoSCT and in partial responses to salvage therapy. Allo SCT may be the treatment of choice for advanced T-cell and NK cell lymphoma and for ATLL. Prophylactic or preemptive DLI may be useful, but requires controlled studies.