1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf03347750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T-cell reactivity to 38 kD insulin-secretory granule protein in patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specificity of an anti-jun-B T-cell response would require processing and presentation of islet (p-cell)-specific jun-B epitopes or the persistent effect of a p-cell cytotropic virus (30) or both, or chemotoxin (31) to induce aberrant expression of jun-B. Roep et al (12,13) generated T-cell lines from IDDM subjects to a 38,000-/W r fraction of insulin secretory granules. Although secretory granules would not be expected to contain jun-B, after isolation they appear to be contaminated by a multiplicity of proteins; moreover, the T-cell lines reacted not only with 38,000-M r granule fraction but also with the pellet fraction that contained endoplasmic reticulum (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specificity of an anti-jun-B T-cell response would require processing and presentation of islet (p-cell)-specific jun-B epitopes or the persistent effect of a p-cell cytotropic virus (30) or both, or chemotoxin (31) to induce aberrant expression of jun-B. Roep et al (12,13) generated T-cell lines from IDDM subjects to a 38,000-/W r fraction of insulin secretory granules. Although secretory granules would not be expected to contain jun-B, after isolation they appear to be contaminated by a multiplicity of proteins; moreover, the T-cell lines reacted not only with 38,000-M r granule fraction but also with the pellet fraction that contained endoplasmic reticulum (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, T-cells in the peripheral blood of recent-onset IDDM subjects and at-risk ICA-positive first-degree relatives of IDDM subjects have been shown to proliferate'to islets (8,9) and specifically to insulin (8,9) and GAD (10,11). In addition, Roep et al (12,13) generated T-cell lines from peripheral blood of recent-onset IDDM subjects to an uncharacterized 38,000-M r fraction of insulin secretory granule membranes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several autoantigens have been identified by autoantibodies in the sera of acutely diabetic and prediabetic subjects, including GAD, IA-2, and insulin (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Recent studies have revealed that the cellular immune response is the major effector mechanism in the destruction of pancreatic ␤-cells in human subjects with type 1 diabetes (6)(7)(8). Among T-cells, T-helper type 1 (Th1) cells that secret interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-␥ are suspected to be the key effector cells responsible for the destruction of pancreatic ␤-cells (9).…”
Section: Suppression and Acceleration Of Autoimmune Diabetes By Neutrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15]. The nature of the islet antigen recognized by diabetogenic T cells is unknown although T cells of diabetic patients have been shown to react to various antigens such as insulin, insulin secretory granules, 38 kDa granule membrane proteins, RINm5F insulinoma membranes, fetal pig proislets, human islets and GAD [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, the relation of such responses with the autoimmune-mediated beta-cell destruction process in IDDM is still an open question.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%