1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01546975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

t-Channel couplings in Kaon-nucleon scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a simple resonance model this behavior is recovered when the vector (g 1 φN N ) and tensor (g 2 φN N ) couplings of the φ meson to the nucleon are equal and have opposite signs. This can be seen from the following parametrizations [23,8],…”
Section: Kk-continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simple resonance model this behavior is recovered when the vector (g 1 φN N ) and tensor (g 2 φN N ) couplings of the φ meson to the nucleon are equal and have opposite signs. This can be seen from the following parametrizations [23,8],…”
Section: Kk-continuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we use the resonant b 1/2,1/2 0 amplitude from Refs. [30,31] and subtract it from our result. 5 Both analyses use the following form for the amplitude…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently has a continuation of the KN amplitudes become possible due to improvements in the data base over the last three decades. A continuation of KN scattering amplitudes has also been performed on the basis of hyperbolic DR [31]. In the latter analysis, however, the t-channel helicity amplitudes have been parametrized by sharp resonance poles, an a priori assumption we seek to avoid in the present analysis.…”
Section: Analytic Continuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example shown in FIGURE 4 addresses the discussion whether a new D 13 (1895) as predicted by Capstick and Roberts or by Loering, Metsch and Petry [33], or a new P 13 (1900) but no D 13 (1895) as suggested by Shklyar, Lenske and Mosel is needed [35], or appropriate tuning of the background contributions is sufficient [34] to understand the cross section peak at 1.9 GeV, which is now even more pronounced than previously reported by SAPHIR [29,30]. The CLAS data points (solid circles) are shown with the combined statistical and fitting uncertainties [28] and compared to the results from SAPHIR (stars [29], triangles [30]) and the ABBHHM collaboration (squares) [31]. FIGURE 4: Total cross section for K + Λ photoproduction.…”
Section: Missing Resonancesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Very recently high-statistics photoproduction cross section data for K + Λ and K + Σ 0 final states, with large kinematical coverage in both 1.6GeV<W<2.5GeV and -0.85< cosθ K *<0.95, have become available [28] that allow to look for new resonances decaying into these kaon-hyperon channels. The example shown in FIGURE 4 addresses the discussion whether a new D 13 (1895) as predicted by Capstick and Roberts or by Loering, Metsch and Petry [33], or a new P 13 (1900) but no D 13 (1895) as suggested by Shklyar, Lenske and Mosel is needed [35], or appropriate tuning of the background contributions is sufficient [34] to understand the cross section peak at 1.9 GeV, which is now even more pronounced than previously reported by SAPHIR [29,30].…”
Section: Missing Resonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%