2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2016.7848427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T-@npi: A twitter-based safety confirmation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) holds both regionally and globally). It is also well known that EQs are clustered in time and the Omori (power) law describes the temporal decay of aftershock activity 19 (see also Ref. 17):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) holds both regionally and globally). It is also well known that EQs are clustered in time and the Omori (power) law describes the temporal decay of aftershock activity 19 (see also Ref. 17):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long back in 1895, Fusakichi Omori of the Tokyo University suggested that the rate of the aftershock counts decreases inversely with time elapsed since the main shock at any epicentre [44]. Utsu later modified that law saying that the rate of aftershocks decrease inversely with a power of the time plus an adjustable constant and the power is close to unity [45] and varies in the range 0.7-1.5. Beno Gutenberg and Charles Francis Richter, both from Caltech, in 1956 proposed a law saying that the logarithm of the number of earthquakes of a particular magnitude or more, occurring in a given region and time period decreases linearly with that particular magnitude.…”
Section: Statistical Physics Of Earthquakes: Omori and Gutenberg-rimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of calm time has been found to be power law in many AE measurements (e.g., tensile failure experiment of paper sheets [16] and volcanic rocks at Stromboli [17]). For the eventoccurrence density, the power-law decay of aftershock activity is known as Omori-Utsu (OU) law in seismology [18,19]. OU-like behavior is also observed in various AE measurements (e.g., microfracturing in a compressed rock [20,21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%