2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(200003)43:3<421::aid-mrm14>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T1? imaging using magnetization-prepared projection encoding (MaPPE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, T 1 is longer than T 2 (e.g., see Refs. 11,12), resulting in slower dephasing and better SNR than traditional T 2 -weighted images (13). Second, when T 1 is long T 1 is also long.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, T 1 is longer than T 2 (e.g., see Refs. 11,12), resulting in slower dephasing and better SNR than traditional T 2 -weighted images (13). Second, when T 1 is long T 1 is also long.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the very long T 1 of the blood relative to tissue makes T 1 particularly suitable for providing blood/tissue contrast. Third, as the spin-locking field is present during the entire procedure it will, if large enough, effectively overwhelm susceptibility-induced gradients (8,13). Finally, Engelhardt and Johnson (11) have shown in muscle and liver tissue of mice embryos, and in agar samples, that T 1 increases with the strength of the locking field B 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured T 1 values of Agar phantoms in this study were consistent with the values in previously published studies (32,33). T 1 decreased as Agar concentration increased, but no obvious T 1 dispersion was seen with spin-lock frequencies ranging from 300 Hz to 700 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T 1 values obtained with imaging methods were systematically lower than those obtained with spectroscopy methods. This may be due to imperfections in gradients and RF pulses, B 1 inhomogeneity (33), and signal loss due to T 2 relaxation caused by imperfect spin-locking in imaging protocol, or T1-weight due to subtraction error during RF-cycling in the imaging protocol. The approximately parallel trend of T 1 values versus Agar concentration between these two methods, especially for Agar phantoms with concentration from 2% to 4% that have similar T 1 as in vivo knee cartilage, implies that the T 1 quantification using the developed imaging method is a robust measurement for in vivo cartilage relaxation time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of T 1ρ and T 2 -weighted images was acquired with a 3D GRE sequence with T 1ρ or T 2 magnetization preparation, respectively [22][23][24][25]. The imaging parameters were: TR/TE = 80/2.96 ms, flip angle = 20°, field-of-view = 68 × 68 mm 2 , slice thickness = 3 mm, matrix = 96 × 192, nominal voxel size = 0.7 × 0.35 × 3 mm 3 , number of slices = 10, acquisition bandwidth = 260 Hz/pixel, and acquisition time of 2 min.…”
Section: T 1ρ and T 2 Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%